Archive for November, 2009
Regardless of what Obama thinks or says, Muslims consider him a Muslim. In the Muslim world, one is automatically a Muslim if the father is a Muslim, and Obama’s birth father was descended from Kenyans who adopted Islam from Arab invaders in Africa. No matter what religion Obama claims publicly, he is still considered a Muslim in the Muslim world. Even if his father was not an active practitioner, Obama’s Islamic inheritance and his public endorsement of Islam make him a useful Muslim. He can proclaim to be a Christian, and even attend a church, and still be considered a good Muslim if it enables and advances Islam.
President Obama’s insistence that America is not in a war with Islam puts us in enormous peril because Islam has declared war on the West. Knowingly or unknowingly; willingly, or not willingly, Obama’s position and policies are helpful to the Islamic totalitarian agenda to conquer the West, and render him useful for its advancement to the extent that his naïveté, ignorance, admission, or arrogance will allow.
Prior to the 2008 Presidential campaign, Obama attended a radical Christian church led by Pastor Jeremiah Wright. However, since becoming President, Obama has demonstrated more passion for Islam than for Christianity.
During the 2008 Presidential Campaign, Candidate Obama never used his middle name “Hussein.” The Islamic name was frowned upon as an insinuation that he was Muslim. “Hussein” was the name of the grandson of the Prophet of Islam, Muhammad. Hussein’s caliphate succession created a rivalry within Islam, marking the early beginnings of Sunni-Shiite differences. 
Obama’s first name “Baraq” is reported to be the name of the mythological winged horse that Mohammed claimed carried him to paradise one night in a dream (while he was sleeping in Medina).
After the election, Obama tried out his full name in Strasburg and uses it henceforth as if it is normal to the sensibilities of Americans in the wake of 9/11.
On his inauguration as president, Barack Hussein Obama received a letter from the Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC) Secretary General, Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, congratulating him for his new office, and calling for Obama to recognize the need for a new partnership between the U.S. and the Muslim world. Ihasanoglu is the major backer of the UN Defamation of Religions resolution that will end freedom of speech and freedom of conscience by criminalizing skepticism of, and opposition to Islam. The Jeddah-based OIC is made up of 57 Muslim-majority nations heavily influenced by the Muslim Brotherhood agenda. The Muslim Brotherhood has the self-described mission of “destroying Western civilization from within.” Ihsanoglu wrote in the letter:
“…commitment of the OIC to cooperate in order to promote a constructive dialogue and fruitful joint action in a bid to work out appropriate solutions to the intractable crises that face the Muslim world and the world at large.” 
Obama promptly sent an unpublicized reply to Ihasanoglu thanking him for the congratulatory wishes. Ihasanoglu’s reply to Obama was published in major U.S. newspapers on January 21, 2008. It stated that the OIC urged Obama to work for “shared” peace rather “imposed” peace:
“We warmly welcome your expressed desire to give a major address in a Muslim nation soon after you assume the presidency and hope it will mark the beginning of a more fruitful and better-informed dialogue between the West and the Muslim world…We firmly believe that America, with your guidance, can help foster that peace, though real peace can only be shared — never imposed. A nation can either be great or feared, but rarely both at the same time.” 
Soon afterward, Obama showed further allegiance to Islamic causes in an interview with Al Arabia television.
Obama appeased Islamists by withdrawing all charges against the masterminds behind the USS Cole and the September 11, 2001 World Trade Center bombing. He halted all military trials of the detainees, banned waterboarding, closed all overseas CIA interrogation centers, and allowed an investigation into the CIA.
He has not sent extra troops to Afghanistan as requested by General McChrystal, and he is determined to close Guantanamo Bay. All this even though a group of five al-Qaeda terrorists at Guantanamo, including one of the 9/11 masterminds, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, described their charges in a document filed March 10, 2009 titled “The Islamic Response,” as:
“badges of honor, which we carry with pride,” further resolving that “killing you and fighting you, destroying you and terrorizing you…are all considered to be great legitimate duty in our religion.”
Even though the group of five further declared they were “terrorists to the bone,” Obama will also abandon the term “enemy combatant” with regard to Guantanamo Bay prisoners.
Attorney General Eric Holder announced on Friday, November 13, 2009 that the five Guantanamo Bay detainees will be transferred to New York to go on trial in civilian court. The publicized concern is that in a civilian court the terrorists will gain access to American interrogation methods and have a jury of “peers.” Ostensibly up for grabs to the interpretation of “fair trial” and “justice,” this makes the American court system hostage to terrorist rational based on Islamic Shari’ah Law, where it is legal to kill non-Muslims who obstruct the Koranic manifesto to make the world submissive to Islam. The jury of peers could ostensibly find the prisoners not guilty and release them free of charges because they acted according to their religious values and also because waterboarding was used to obtain evidence, which Obama has already denounced as “torture.” Such a scenario would be a devastating blow to Western democratic values and a huge victory for Islam.
Just prior to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, President Obama signed a Presidential Determination on January 27, 2009 which appeared in the Federal Register on February 4, 2009. The Determination allows for hundreds of thousands of Palestinian refuges to “migrate” at American taxpayer expense. Pursuant to the Migration Refugee Assistance Act of 1962, the Determination allowed for $20.3 million in migration assistance to the Palestinian refugees and conflict victims in Gaza, giving aid to Palestinians with ties to Hamas. According to the Register, President Obama’s decision was necessary due to the “victims” urgent needs. It is worded:
“…it is important to the national interest to furnish assistance under the Act in an amount not to exceed $20.3 million from the United States Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance Fund for the purpose of meeting unexpected and urgent refugee and migration needs, including by contributions to international, governmental, and nongovernmental organizations and payment of administrative expenses of the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration of the Department of State, related to humanitarian needs of Palestinian refugees and conflict victims in Gaza.” 
In Cairo, Secretary of State Hilary Clinton announced an American Initiative to spend more money in the effort to rebuild Gaza, giving a UN agency authority to administer the funds. Hilary Clinton promised an additional $600 million to cover the Palestinian Authority’s budget deficit in the West Bank and $300 million in reconstruction aid to Gaza.  Then in early June 2009, The United States agreed to provide another $55 million in funding to the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA). That pledge brought 2009 funds given to the UNRWA to $154.5 million.
In confusing or intentionally misleading statements, Obama has acknowledged the importance of recognizing that there is “a battle or a war” against some terrorist organizations which are not representative of the broader Arab Muslim community.”
Choosing his words carefully in an attempt to win over ‘moderate’ Muslims, Obama explained in a CNN’s “Anderson Cooper 360” television interview why he has not used the phrase, “war on terror,” Obama answered:
“Words matter in this situation because one of the ways we’re going to win this struggle is through the battle of hearts and minds.”
Whose hearts and minds he wants to win is highly questionable. In his inaugural address, Obama invited the Muslim world to embark on “a new way forward, based on mutual interest and mutual respect.” As president, his first call to a head of state was to Mahmoud Abbas, leader of Fatah party in the Palestinian territory. Not addressing the fact that the United States and Europe have been the targets of Islamic jihadists for centuries, Obama’s apologetic tone indicated that Americans are disrespectful:
“My job to the Muslim world is to communicate that the Americans are not your enemy…although we sometimes make mistakes… and have not been perfect…too often the United States starts by dictating and fails to use the language of respect.”
According to an article by Zudhi Jasser in Family Security Matters, Muslims in the U.S. are likely to view Obama’s administration as a friendly one. Jasser revealed that the group, The Congressional Muslim Staffers Association (CMSA), is trying to establish themselves in Obama’s Administration with prominent and influential positions in the White House, the House, and the Senate. Jasser wrote that the CMSA hosted an inaugural gala for the new President with an invitation list of Islamists in the United States that share the ideologies of political Islam and the Muslim Brotherhood.
As a result, Obama appointed Arif Alikhan, a Sunni Muslim to the sensitive position of Assistant Secretary to Homeland Security. He also appointed Kareem Shora, the national executive director for the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, to a position on the Homeland Security Advisory Council.
The Homeland Security Office released a report on April 7, 2009 titled “Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment.” Police and sheriff departments across the U.S. received a copy of the report that defined “rightwing extremism in the United States” as groups that reject federal authority in favor of state or local authority. The definition included returning U.S. veterans, and groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single-issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration.
Multiple lawsuits filed during the 2008 Presidential Campaign challenged Obama’s presidential qualifications. Many believe he is not qualified to be President because he will not produce a physical copy of the birth certificate. Skeptics claim there is ample evidence that Obama was born in Kenya rather than Hawaii as the candidate maintains, believing a birth certificate posted on Obama’s campaign website was inauthentic.
Sarah Obama, Barack Hussein Obama’s paternal grandmother in Africa, claims to have been present when her grandson was born in Kenya. Another woman who would have known the circumstances of Obama’s controversial birth was Madelyn Dunham, his now deceased maternal grandmother who he visited in Hawaii twelve days prior to the 2008 Presidential Election. Early in the 2008 Presidential Campaign, Obama admitted that his grandmother was a “typical white person, “who was sometimes afraid of some black men.” That is about all that the American public knew about Madelyn Dunham until Obama visited her in Hawaii days before the election. Speculations were that Obama’s real intention was to go to Hawaii to be sure his birth certificate did not become public, rather than to just visit his grandmother. The birth certificate remains an enigma today because within two weeks of the visit, Madelyn Dunham was deceased. In an ABC’s Good Morning America interview prior to Madelyn’s death, Obama said:
“Without going through the details too much, she’s gravely ill. We weren’t sure and I’m still not sure whether she makes it to Election Day.” 
Prior to the Hawaii trip; the media reported that Madelyn Dunham’s health had deteriorated after recently breaking a hip, adding that it was uncertain how long she would live. Obama announced the death of his maternal Grandmother on the day before he was elected U.S. President, just eleven days after his trip to Hawaii. In a joint statement with his younger half-sister who was in Hawaii at the time, Obama told the press from North Carolina that his grandmother had died peacefully after a battle with cancer. A CNN report quoted Obama’s statement at a rally in Charlotte:
“She has gone home and she died peacefully in her sleep with my sister at her side… I’m not going to talk about it long because it’s hard to talk about.”
At his acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention, Barack Hussein spoke kindly of his grandmother:
“She’s the one who put off buying a new car or a new dress for herself so that I could have a better life.”
The ashes of Madelyn Dunham were scattered out to sea in late December while the
Obama family was on a post election “vacation.”
Meanwhile, focused on the legitimacy of Obama’s citizenship, Hawaii’s Governor Linda Lingle placed the birth certificate in question under seal with Hawaii’s Department of Health to ensure no one in the press obtained access to it. In a letter to World Net Daily, Governor Lingle said that the birth certificate would be released if Obama requested. The governor’s communication gave no indication whether the birth certificate was originally issued by a Hawaiian doctor or if it was generated in Kenya and subsequently registered in Hawaii.
Confusing the circumstances of Obama’s birthplace, Obama’s younger half-sister told reporters in a November 2004 interview with the Rainbow Newsletter that Barack Obama was born on August 4, 1961, at Queens Medical Center in Honolulu. Then, in a February 2008 interview with Honolulu Star-Bulletin she reportedly told reporters that Obama was born at the Kapiolani Medical Center for Women and Children.
Hawaii’s KGMB9 News reported that a health official in Hawaii, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, said she had seen a birth certificate. Fukino said that Hawaiian laws regarding identity theft prevented her from releasing the document. 
After multiple dismissed lawsuits to produce the birth certificate, Obama still will not allow the birth certificate’s release. The secrecy perpetuates suspicion that Obama is not a natural born U.S. citizen, and therefore ineligible for Presidency.
Unfortunately, Madelyn Dunham could have shared information about Obama’s life. She could have helped Obama prove the country of his citizenship, and possibly elaborated on his relationship with associates who are alleged to be terrorists and communists. She also could have answered the question of who paid for her grandson’s expensive tuitions at Hawaii’s elite Punahou High School, and his college education at Harvard.
Barack Hussein Obama’s background and associations make him a well groomed President for Communist and Islamic movements. Sharing mutual goals and historical allies, the grooming consists of radically controversial Communist and Islamic mentors and sponsors like Frank Marshall Davis, Saul Alinsky, Bill Ayers, Tony Rezko, Rashid Khalidi, Kahlil al-Mansour, and the infamous Reverend Jeremiah Wright.
Frank Marshall Davis was picked by his maternal grandfather, Stanley Dunham, to be a black role model, mentor, and father figure for Obama when he was a youth in Hawaii. Obama would later write about the man identified as “Frank” in his book, “Dreams of My Father.” Giving Obama advice on college and racial matters, Frank, considered a security threat to the U.S., was under surveillance for 19 years, and had a 600 page file with the FBI. With communist associations in Hawaii and Chicago, Frank shared his poetry with Obama, which consisted of anti-white, anti-Christian, and anti-American themes.
Saul Alinsky, considered the father of community organizing in Chicago, wrote a book called “Rules for Radicals” which he actually dedicated to Lucifer. The book advocates working within a system to obtain revolutionary ‘change’ in a given society, noting that it requires an agitating ‘organizer’ whose job is to persuade the people in the community to believe that unresponsive governments and greedy corporations are the sources of their alleged misery. The organizing agitator then unifies the community to demand what they think they deserve, until governments and corporations grant their wishes in appeasement to quiet them.
This excerpt from “Rules for Radicals” describes Saul Alinksy’s recipe for change:
“There’s another reason for working inside the system. Dostoevsky said that taking a new step is what people fear most. Any revolutionary change must be preceded by a passive, affirmative, non-challenging attitude toward change among the mass of our people. They must feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and change the future. This acceptance is the reformation essential to any revolution. To bring on this reformation requires that the organizer work inside the system…”
Alinsky believed the established church communities provided perfect launching for agitation, creating bonds, and for demanding goods and services. A few years after his death, Saul Alinsky’s Chicago followers hired Barack Obama as a community organizer for the Developing Communities Project (DCP) of the Calumet Community Religious Conference (CCRC) in Chicago’s South Side poor neighborhoods.
Organization efforts required associations with pastors and congregants so Obama joined the Trinity United Church of Christ where Black Nationalist pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, preached an anti-American, racist, “black” gospel. Obama would later say that the DCP position may have been the best education he had ever received in the methods of community organizing.
Obama’s experiences later broadened to an association with Allison Davis, who hired Barack Obama in his small Chicago law firm called Davis, Miner, and Barnhill in 1993. Obama left the firm five years later to go into business with the Syrian-American housing developer, Tony Rezko, who had been a client of Allison Davis.
Tony Rezko, an activist who raised money for both U.S. political parties, was one of Obama’s first campaign contributors when he ran for the Illinois state senate. Then in 1998 Senator Obama wrote letters to city and state officials urging them to fund a Davis-Rezko housing project. Tony Rezco was indicted on sixteen counts of financial corruption, charges of fraud, attempted extortion, money laundering, aiding bribery, and demanding kickbacks from companies seeking state government business contracts under Illinois’ former governor, Rod Blagojevich. Rezko was convicted on multiple charges of federal corruption just one day after Obama became the Democratic Presidential nominee. Obama was cited in the indictment as receiving political contributions out of Rezko’s kickback fund.
Tony Rezko hosted fundraising events for Obama and was a member of Obama’s Senate campaign finance committee, which collected $14 million for Obama’s race against conservative Alan Keyes. In order to avoid a scandal during the 2008 presidential campaign, Obama returned $85,000 to Rezko.
Bill Ayers was former leader of the Weather Underground, part of the “domestic terrorist group,” a radical left-wing group that advocated violence against the United States that during the late sixties and early seventies, openly called for revolution in America. The Weather Underground participated in the bombings of the U.S. Capital, the Pentagon and a State Department building while Ayers and his wife, Bernadette Dohrn, hid from law enforcement. Ayers and Dohrn went underground in 1970 after others in the group accidentally detonated a bomb in a Greenwich Village townhouse, killing three of the group’s members. In 1981 Ayers and Dohrn turned themselves in to federal authorities, but all charges were dropped as a result of alleged government misconduct. In his 2001 memoir, Ayers wrote, “I don’t regret setting the bombs. I feel we didn’t do enough.”  
A top official at the Pentagon during former-President George H. W. Bush’s Administration and a former CIA intelligence officer maintained that Barack Obama and Bill Ayers funneled money to Professor Rashid Khalidi, a known terrorist sympathizer and former spokesman for Yassir Arafat. Born in New York to a Jerusalem born Saudi citizen with Palestinian origins who worked for the UN, Khalidi was the director of the Beirut, Lebanon official Palestinian press agency, FAFA from 1972 through 1983. Khalidi left Chicago for Columbia University in New York, where he holds the Edward Said Chair in Arab Studies. He serves on the faculty as History teacher and is the director of its Middle East Institute in the School of International and Public Affairs.
Bill Ayers and Barack Obama gave testimonials at a goodbye party for Khalidi when he left Chicago for New York. Khalidi is reported to have direct ties to the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO), a group on the US State Department’s list of known terrorist groups. Khalidi is also the professor who invited Iranian President Ahmedinejad to visit Columbia University after he finished his speech at the UN in September 2007.
Bill Ayers formed the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, the radical “education reform” organization when philanthropist Walter Annenberg made a $500 million grant to cities across the nation for the public school reform in 1995. Barack Obama was the first chairman of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge. Obama stepped down in 1999, but remained on the board until 2001.
Obama and Ayers sat on the board of the nonprofit Woods Fund in 2001 while Obama was Senator. The Woods Fund is a Chicago-based foundation that claims its primary mission is to make financial grants to create and increase opportunities for disadvantaged people and low-income communities. The Woods Fund granted $40,000 in 2001, and $70,000 in 2002 to the Arab American Action Network, a Chicago-based group founded by Rashid Khalidi. The Woods Fund also granted money to Jeremiah Wright’s Trinity United Church of Christ, and to organizations that donated to Obama’s senate campaign. In return, Obama sought earmarks for those organizations in the Senate. 
Today a professor of education and a Senior University Scholar at the University of Illinois in Chicago, Ayers has also authored a series of books about parenting and educating children.
Obama served on the board of the Chicago-based charity, The Joyce Foundation from 2000-2001. During that time, the Joyce Foundation gave close to $1.1 million in two separate grants to help develop the privately-owned Chicago Climate Exchange pioneering a carbon trading exchange system. With worldwide affiliates, the Chicago Climate Exchange claims to be North America’s only cap and trade system for all six greenhouse gases, and may play a large role in the Cap and Trade Bill.
Obama was recruited by Madeline Talbott, head organizer for Illinois ACORN, in the early 1990’s when the group wanted banks to ease down-payment requirements and ignore weak credit histories. Talbot recruited Obama to run training sessions for activists pushing the uncertain loans. With many of the loaning decisions reportedly based solely on the color of the borrowers’ skin, the cause endorsed lending to people who could never reasonably pay their loans off. With Obama’s radical religious connections, one wonders if potential requirements had anything to do with borrower’s religious affiliations as well. ACORN would later become a key beneficiary of TARP’s rescue plan in October 2008. 
The Association of Community Organizations for Reform (ACORN) received funding from the Chicago Annenberg Challenge Grant, the Woods Fund, and the Joyce Foundation when Obama served on their boards.
Khalid Abdullah Tariq al-Mansour, a lawyer who helped establish the Black Panthers, recommended Barack Obama for admission to Harvard Law School in 1988. In the 1960s, al-Mansour was involved with California Bay Area racial politics as founder of a group called the African American Association. Formerly known as Don Warden, al-Mansour would later become a Muslim. A key figure in the Islamist “stealth” jihad, al-Mansour recruits prison inmates and mosque worshippers to engage in an apocalyptic battle against America. In the words of the Muslim Brotherhood, the Islamic cause is to:
“Eliminate and destroy the Western civilization from within.”
In the mid 1970’s, al-Mansour met Saudi Prince Alwaweed bin Talal. Since then al-Mansour has been an adviser to Saudi billionaires who fund stealth jihad and spread Wahhabi Islamic extremism in America.
Nephew of the late Saudi King Fahd, Prince Alwaweed founded the Alwaweed Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding (ACMSU) that has given millions of dollars to Middle East studies programs at Georgetown, Harvard, UC Berkeley, and other Universities. He offered ten million dollars to families of victims of the terrorist attacks on 9/11. After Mayor Rudolph Giuliani of New York rejected the offer, Alwaweed criticized U.S. Middle East policy, especially regarding the Arab-Israeli conflict saying: “Our Palestinian brethren continue to be slaughtered at the hands of Israelis as the world (looks the other way).”  Alwaweed also suggested that the terrorist attacks were an indication that America “should re-examine its policies in the Middle East and adopt a more balanced stand toward the Palestinian cause.”
The Nation of Islam’s leader, Louis Farrakhan, endorsed Obama for President. Farrakhan is known for targeting hateful statements toward Jews, whites and homosexuals. In his address to the world at Saviors’ Day in 2008, Farrakhan, said:
“Brothers and sisters, Barack Obama to me, is a herald of the Messiah. Barack Obama is like the trumpet that alerts you something new, something better is on the way. …Would God allow Barack to be president of a country that has been so racist, so evil in its treatment of Hispanics, Native Americans, and Blacks? Would God do something like that? Yeah. Of course he would.”
As President, Obama’s service to an Islamic agenda extends to participation in the “Alliance of Civilizations.” The UN-sponsored Alliance reflects the views of the OIC. A 2005 statement issued after a summit in Mecca explains the Alliance mission to internationally criminalize defamation of Islam as a form of racism:
“The Conference underlined the need to collectively endeavor to reflect the noble Islamic values, counter Islamophobia, defamation of Islam and its values and desecration of Islamic holy sites, and to effectively coordinate with States as well as regional and international institutions and organizations to urge them to criminalize this phenomenon as a form of racism.” 
The Obama campaign and the Democratic National Committee began the 2008 Presidential Campaign with $95 million in cash, according to reports filed with the Federal Election Commission (FEC). By the end of September 2008, more than half Obama’s donations came from small donors whose names the Obama campaign would not disclose. Only $39.6 million of the campaign’s donations came from identified donors.
Federal law requires campaigns to identify donors who give more than $200 during the election cycle. The Federal Election Committee (FEC) determined that the Obama campaign drew in $222.7 million in donations of $200 or less so there is no way of knowing who they came from.
The FEC did notice unusual patterns in the donations among disclosed donors who went beyond the $200 minimum. The FEC does a post-election review of all presidential campaigns, but results can take three or four years. 
Further endorsement of Islam within his administration came when Obama announced in early February 2009 that he would change a “Faith Based Initiative” originally announced by former President Bush early in 2001. Obama said a new expanded Office for Faith-based and Neighborhood Partnerships will give money to mosques and Islamic charities in a sign of “outreach to the Muslim world.”
Writer and journalist, Debbie Schussel reported that President Bush had invited Hezbollah agent and pro-Iranian Imam, Hassan Qazwini to his Crawford ranch to help him design the Faith-Based and Community Initiatives Act. 
The Faith-Based Act creates tax incentives and other advantages to encourage charitable contributions and participation in so-called Faith-Based programs. When addressing criticism that the Act violated separation of church and state as provided for in the “establishment clause” of the 1st Amendment to the Constitution, the Bush Administration claimed that funds would create a “compassion capital fund” matching private donations to help small community and faith-based charities with non-religious expenses. President Bush maintained that the office would assist and encourage faith-based organizations to combat problems like “drug addiction, homelessness, and soup.” 
Further troubling is the unqualified language Barack Obama used throughout his campaign, and continues to use. He painted an abstract picture of “change” with a broad brush without accurately describing what the change would be. For example, he said that part of the money for the proposed Economic Recovery and Reinvestment Plan should go to education so that foreign investors would continue to invest in America, while promising to “return America’s wealth to its rightful owners.” Exactly who he thinks the rightful owners are is left to the imagination. What education (or re-education) efforts this will include is also left to the imagination, as he mentioned Science and Math as mere examples. In his first Press Conference at the White House later the same day, February 9, 2009, he added Libraries and Labs, this time without mentioning Science and Math. He added that we need to “experiment with Charter Schools, hire new teachers and fire bad teachers.” Does he mean that we need Charter schools like the Tarek ibn Ziyad Academy (TIZA) in Minnesota, recently discovered promoting Islam with taxpayer dollars? An increase in education funding could usher in more than Americans would allow if they knew the details, such as an expansion of Bill Clinton’s 1995 Education Guidelines that allowed Islamic religious programs disguised as cultural enlightenment.
The definition of good and bad is merely suggestive based on what we expect to be right. Americans can agree that currently good teachers do not get enough recognition, and it is difficult to fire bad teachers. We assume education reform efforts will uphold traditional American values of freedom and liberty. But without qualification, the unqualified statements could actually mean that funds will be used to hire new teachers who will be submissive to an agenda, and to fire those who value Christian or American traditions and Constitutional values.
Obama wants to create more jobs with infrastructure projects, but who will benefit? What companies will get the contracts and who will they hire? Who are the foreign investors Obama hopes will invest in America? Is Obama part of a larger plan to provide labor and money for the already immensely oil rich Saudis, who are known to fund financial jihad, and have been successful in keeping secret the American corporations they have ownership in? Obama pressured Americans to pass the stimulus bill quickly, saying, “so we must act quickly to avoid disaster.”
What disaster is he referring to? Could the urgency actually be extortion to ward off a potential terrorist attack? Americans need to realize that unqualified statements are potential threats because without specific word qualification and transparent plans, any definition is possible from a man who is potentially unqualified to hold the office of U.S. President.
Consistent with the premise of this book and the examples in this chapter, that our leaders have willingly or unwillingly coerced Americans to accept Islam while steadily making the U.S. a dhimmi nation, Obama bowed down to Saudi King Abdullah at the G20 in Europe. Expressions on the faces of onlookers showed both amusement and surprise, and many Americans called the spectacle a national disgrace. Just a few months earlier in Cairo, Obama said that the U.S. is “one of the largest Muslim countries in the world.” Perhaps Obama bowed down to the Emperor Akihito of Japan a few months later to make the bow to Saudi King Abdullah appear normal, as he had not bowed down to any leader previously.
The federal government requires “sensitivity training” for federal employees, including those who work at the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Political correctness combined with acceptance of Muslims in the U.S. military produced 13 victims when Army Major Nidal Hasan went on a murderous rampage at Fort Hood only days after the House Judiciary Committee removed a part of the Patriot Act for tracking non-U.S. citizens in anti-terrorism investigations. Obama would not admit it was an act of Islamic terror in spite of mounting evidence that proves Major Hasan had been openly espousing Islamic jihad in the military against non-Muslims for years.
After the banking bailout opened the floodgates as Bush left office, Obama has nationalized entire industries with taxpayer bailouts, passed the Economic Stimulus Bill, pushed the Health Care Bill, and the Cap and Trade Bill; converting a once free-market into a government-run socialist state. All of these actions will rely heavily on massive tax increases from the American taxpayer, with more control over their lives for generations to come.
Obama’s socialist plans may have a lot to do with the only piece of legislation he introduced by himself in his single term as Senator. During the 2008 Presidential Campaign, the Obama sponsored bill, The Global Poverty Act, had the support of liberal religious groups, and will make levels of U.S. foreign aid submissive to the dictates of the UN under the guise of humanitarianism. Senator Joe Biden, then Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, pushed the bill as it passed the House with only a voice vote—even though most of the Congressmen did not know that it committed the U.S. to spending 0.7 percent of its gross national product on foreign aid; with a 2015 goal of $845 billion.
Obama’s leniency toward Islam provokes the question of whose and what interests he is really standing for. The man with the name Barack Hussein Obama apologizes for America to Muslim nations while he endorses Islam in America. The socialist plans he has proposed and enacted will force Americans into feudal serfdom, ending the liberty and freedom we cherish today.
With Communism riding the backs of liberal Democrats, and Islamists riding the backs of both, Obama’s plans are not just socialist. They form a framework for generations of “dhimmitude,” a class status forced upon non-Muslims by coercion and constant fear of reprisal as a result of cowardice, vulnerability, bribery and extortion, while paying “jizya”taxes for the “right” to live as second class citizens. Obama’s controversial plans and the resulting taxes are effectively dhimmitude and jizya in accordance to Islamic doctrine–to control dhimmis until they embrace Islam completely.
 Warner, Bill; “Barack Obama and Slavery,” September 26, 2008http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/09/barack_obama_and_slavery.html
 “Who was Responsible for the al-Aqsa Mosque in 1969?” http://www.palestinefacts.org/pf_1967to1991_alaqsa_fire_1969.php
 “Obama Sends Letter to OIC Head to Boost Relations,” February 1, 2009, http://www.worldbulletin.net/news_detail.php?id=35935
 “Obama Says U.S. Can Work With Muslims: OIC,” February 1, 2009, http://www.khaleejtimes.com/DisplayArticle08.asp?xfile=data/middleeast/2009/February/middleeast_February30.xml§ion=middleeast
 Campanille, Carl; “Terrorist Thugs to the Bone,” March 11, 2009, http://www.nypost.com/seven/03112009/news/worldnews/terrorist_thugs_to_the_bone_158983.htm
 Accused 9/11 Plotter Khalid Sheikh Mohammed Faces Trial in New York, November 13, 2009, http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/11/13/khalid.sheikh.mohammed/index.html
 February 4, 2009, http://www.thefederalregister.com/d.p/2009-02-04-E9-2488
 May, Theodore; March 2, 2009, http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/egypt/090302/what-clinton-brings-egypt
 NNRWA To Get $55 Million From US, June 10, 2009, http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/Flash.aspx/166317
 Baldor, Lolita C; “Obama: US Choosing Words Carefully in War on Terror,” February 3, 2009, http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090204/ap_on_go_pr_wh/obama_war_on_terror
 Jasser, Zudhi;“Exclusive: Obama Administration Stacking the Deck with Islamists,” April 15, 2009 http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.2999/pub_detail.asp
 Hudson, Audrey & Lake, Eli; “Federal Agency Warns of Radicals on Right,” April 14, 2009, http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/14/federal-agency-warns-of-radicals-on-right/
 CBS2 Chicago article, “Obama’s Grandmother Dies on Eve of Election”, November 3, 2008, http://cbs2chicago.com/local/obama.grandmother.died.2.855394.html
 “Obama’ Grandmother Remembered as Calm, Assured,” November 4, 2008, http://www.gainesville.com/article/20081104/NEWS/811040968/1034/NEWS?Title=Obama_s_grandmother_remembered_as_calm__assured
 Corsi, Jerome, World Net Daily, “Obama’s Birth Certificate Sealed by Hawaii’s Governor”, October 26, 2008, http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=79174
 Fank Marshall Davis Files,” http://www.usasurvival.org/marshall.fbi.files.html
 Malkin, Michelle; “Help Unlock the Obama/Ayers Papers,” http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/19/help-unlock-the-obamaayers-papers/
 Maguire, Tom; “Obama, Ayers, and the Annenberg Challenge Cover-Up,” August 22, 2008, http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/obama-ayers-and-the-annenberg-challenge-cover-up/2/
 Barnes, Ed; “Obama Years ago Helped Fund Carbon Program he is Now Pushing Through Congress,” March 25, 2009, http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/03/25/obama-years-ago-helped-fund-carbon-program-pushing-congress/
 “The Meltdown’s Acorn,” New York Post, September 29, 2009, http://www.nypost.com/seven/09292008/postopinion/editorials/the_meltdowns_acorn_131274.htm
 Perazzo, John; “Black Racists Recruited to Guide the Jihad,” Front Page Magazine, 10/10/2008, http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.aspx?GUID=0F03A69D-2986-4CE8-9158-C986849424D5
 “Khalid Abdullah Tariq al-Mansour,” http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/Articles/katalm.html
 Timmerman, Kenneth R.; Secret, “Foreign Money Floods Into Obama Campaign,” September 29, 2008, http://www.newsmax.com/timmerman/Obama_fundraising_illegal/2008/09/29/135718.html
 Schussel, Debbie; “Obama Expands Worst Bush Idea: Announces He’ll Give Your Tax $$$ to Mosques,” February 5, 2005, http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=254775
 “Faith Based Initiative: Current Status,” April 16, 2002, http://usgovinfo.about.com/library/weekly/aa053001a.htm
 January, 30, 2001, http://usgovinfo.about.com/library/weekly/aa012901a.htm
 Kincaid, Cliff; “Obama’s Global Tax Proposal Up for Senate Vote,” February 12, 2008, http://www.aim.org/aim-column/obamas-global-tax-proposal-up-for-senate-vote/
Welcome to the White House
Direct relations were established between the White House and the Muslim community under Bill Clinton from 1992-2000, and were strengthened under George W. Bush’s administration from 2000-2008. Bill Clinton was the first to commend Islam in public speeches, and the first to issue invitations to the White House on Islamic holidays such as a yearly dinner celebrating the Islamic fasting month of Ramadan that continued through George W. Bush’s Administration and into the Barrack Obama’s.
The State Department established an Islamic website in 2000, proving that Bill Clinton’s administration was actually sanctioning Islam in the White House while the pledge of allegiance and nativity scenes were being systematically removed from schools and public institutions. Furthermore, the date was prior to 9/11. Madeline Albright formally encouraged Muslims to apply for the Foreign Service as she endorsed the website at the White House hosted Islamic dinner in 2000:
“I am pleased that since last year the State Department has inaugurated a new website entitled Islam in America.” Its purpose is to help people everywhere learn more about the positive force that Islam has become in American life and about the growing role of Muslim Americans as they are there to play a role in ensuring the security, prosperity, and freedom of our land. Equally vital are the international exchange and people-to-people programs we conduct with Muslim-majority nations. These efforts bring distinguished Muslim visitors to our shores to exchange views and promote understanding… We are strongly encouraging young Muslim Americans to apply to the Foreign Service as part of our overall effort to attract talent and promote diversity…”
A 2009 program sponsored by the department called Citizen Exchange Program gives a grant to the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and the National Peace Foundation to co-sponsor a citizen exchange project between the U.S. and the Middle East. The ISNA is instrumental in financing and exercising control over most of the mosques in the United States, and is an arm of the Muslim Brotherhood that created Hamas. The program is apparently a one-way exchange, as it is meant to explore Islam, the functions of Islamic institutions in the United States, and the activities of interfaith work. Professionals from Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates will visit the United States, and American professionals will visit the Middle East. 
Former Reagan Defense official, and President of the Center for Security Policy, Frank Gaffney Jr., wrote a lengthy article in 2003 describing how Islamists and individuals from the Council of American Islamic Relations (CAIR) were invited into the White House. According to Gaffney, Grover Norquist was a conservative coalition builder against Communism in Central America, Africa and Afghanistan who he knew personally. Norqist formed the Islamic Institute in 1998 as an outreach organization, initially financed by Abdurrahman Alamoudi who was also Bill Clinton’s Islamic Affairs Advisor and financial supporter. Its stated purpose was to cultivate Muslim-Americans and Arab-Americans with conservative family values. Their professed confidence in capitalism made them potential Republican Party allies for the 2000 Presidential election.
Alamoudi, convicted in 2004 on terror financing related charges, cultivated ties with the Democratic Party during the Clinton Administration and donated to its candidates. His donations enabled his access to the White House, leading to oversight of selection, training and certification for Muslim chaplains in the U.S. military. Self described supporter of Hamas and Hezbollah, Alamoudi was the Saudi billionaire who helped Bill Clinton write the 1995 Educational Guidelines that were distributed to American schools across the nation, profoundly effecting what our children learn in school in spite of States sovereignty regarding education. Alamoudi addressed the Annual Convention of the Islamic Association of Palestine (IAP) in 1996 with the following statement:
“If we are outside this country we can say ‘Oh, Allah destroy America.’ But once we are here, our mission in this country is to change it.”
Alamoudi was caught on tape complaining that Osama bin Laden had not killed enough Americans in the U.S. embassy bombings in Africa. Alamoudi was also one of Al-Qaida’s top fund-raisers in America, according to the U.S. Treasury Department.
Alamoudi and his business partner, Khalid Mahfouz, founder of terror-tied Muwafaq Foundation, funded a software company in 1994/1995 named Ptech. Ptech was given control of some US top-secret IT programs, and Ptech had redesigned, and ran the FAA system on September 11, 2001. Khalid Mahfouz had previously endeared himself to George W. Bush in the late 1980s with a $25 million bailout of the Harken Energy Company which Bush had financial interest in.
In 1998, Alamoudi wrote two personal checks for $10,000 each to help start Norquist’s Islamic Institute. According to Gaffney, Alamoudi also made payments in 2000 and 2001 totaling $50,000 to a lobbying firm Norquist was associated with.
Alamoudi was arrested and charged in 2004 for engaging in illegal financial transactions with the Libyan government through a charity used by Qadhafi to finance terrorist operations. According to an affidavit filed at the time, Alamoudi admitted to trying to take $340,000 in sequentially numbered $100 bills to Syria, en route to Saudi bank accounts. Alamoudi told authorities in Britain that once the Libyan funds were in the Saudi banks, he could withdraw from them in $10,000 increments to pay the expenses of organizations that he was associated with in the United States. He admitted to undertaking other similar transactions involving amounts of $10,000- $20,000.
In addition to the initial $20,000 from Alamoudi, the Islamic Institute was able to receive funding from other secretly affiliated organizations. The Washington Post described such organizations as a:
“Secretive group of tightly connected Muslim charities, think tanks and businesses based in Northern Virginia used to funnel millions of dollars to terrorists and launder millions more.”
Published tax returns and foundation records later showed that the majority of the Norquist’s Islamic Institute funds came from Arab Persian Gulf states and their U.S. funding system, a number of which were later raided by federal anti-terrorism task forces, such as The Holy Land Foundation in Texas. Shut down in 2007, The Holy Land Foundation was found to have been funding Hamas and terrorist organizations overseas. So the Islamic Institute was effectively an Islamic charity meant to spread Islam.
Norquist, trusted in Washington, was toasted in 2003 at a black-tie dinner for his nationwide initiatives to memorialize Ronald Reagan. Attended by nearly 300 conservative activists and politicians at Washington’s Mayflower Hotel, it was hoped that the event would bring in votes and campaign contributions for Republicans. Most in the audience were unaware that Norquist had been enabling causes of radical Islamists funded by Saudi Arabia during Bush’s Administration.
With untold consequences for the nation, the Director of Norquist’s Islamic Institute, Khaled Saffuri, and deputy to Alamoudi regarding its affairs, enabled Islamists to influence the American military, the prison system, the educational system from K-12 through university level, and the political arena.
A Palestinian by birth, Saffuri reportedly supported families of suicide bombers. He was also active in Muslim-supported operations in Bosnia. Saffuri would later denounce President Bush for shutting down the Holy Land Foundation.
At Norquist’s suggestion in the summer of 1999, Gaffney moved his Center for Security Policy into Norquist’s new office space, which also housed the “Wednesday Group” meetings and the Saffuri-headed Islamic Institute. Gaffney attended the weekly meetings, which Saffuri also attended in the late 1990’s. Though the meetings were supposed to be comprised of conservative activists and libertarians, Gaffney noted that participants rarely, if ever, addressed national security issues.
In 2000, Saffuri was George W. Bush’s presidential campaign National Advisor on Arab and Muslim Affairs in an effort to obtain votes and donations from states with significant Muslim populations. In February 2001, Insight Magazine reported:
“In September 2000, on Karl Rove’s way to the airport to catch his flight back to Texas, Khaled Saffuri, executive director of the Islamic Institute, joined Rove in his car. Saffuri explained to him that the vote of the Arab-American community, which includes both Muslims and Christians, still was up for grabs. The community is prosperous and could be the source of considerable campaign contributions. If Bush would mention in public just a few of the issues that concern Arab-Americans, Saffuri told Rove, he would win their hearts, their minds and their support.”
President Bush held a meeting in Austin on May 1, 2000 with Alamoudi, Saffuri, and some other immoderate Muslims. The National Journal reported on the event:
“It was the summer of 2000, and for George W. Bush, the meeting held the promise of an unusual but important endorsement for his presidential bid. Conservative activist Grover Norquist had persuaded the Republican nominee to sit down with leaders of the Muslim American Political Coordinating Committee, a confederation of four Muslim community groups.”
Gaffney recounted that influential Washington conservatives, would-be politicians, think-tank associates, journalists, and an increasing number of lobbyists attended the Islamic Institute presentations. The topics included the plight of Palestinians under Israeli occupation, the misunderstood Islamist government of Sudan, the supposed innocent process of selecting Muslim chaplains for the armed forces, the so-called honored status of women in the Muslim world. Discussions include efforts to promote Islamic causes and candidates within Republican circles.
A few weeks after 9/11, Gaffney spoke up about the fact that Alamoudi’s American Muslim Council (AMC) was among the groups invited to the White House. Gaffney wrote of his observation that the AMC’s website featured a link called: “Know Your Rights,” which led to a statement urging Muslims not to talk to the FBI. A linked statement was in the name of the National Coalition to Protect Political Freedom (NCPPF). The NCPPF is a legal aid office for terrorists, and an organization which the AMC was a member. The link disappeared and was subsequently denied after Gaffney brought it to Norquist’s attention. While the link was active, the AMC had been scheduled to meet with the President to discuss how Muslims could supposedly help with the war on terror.
Sami al-Arian, a professor at South Florida University, was then president of the NCPPF. He was also Secretary of the worldwide governing council of the terrorist organization, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) who Alamoudi had addressed in 1996 and has been held responsible for suicide-bombings.
Despite al-Arian’s radical Islamist sympathies, the Bush campaign met with him to gain Muslim support in Florida. A photograph of Bush with al-Arian in March 2000 received considerable attention after al-Arian was arrested on forty terrorism-related charges in February 2003 and sentenced to 57 months in prison.
With credit for time served, Al-Arian was supposed to serve the balance of 19 months and then be deported. He was not deported however, because in March 2008 he refused to testify when the Department of Justice issued a subpoena for him to appear before another grand jury. As a result, contempt charges followed in June 2008, and in September 2008 Al-Arian was released from detention on bond and placed under house arrest to await the trial for contempt.
Al-Arian’s arrest in 2003 was made possible by the Patriot Act, enabling U.S. law enforcement and intelligence agencies to share the wiretaps of Sami al-Arian coordinating Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) operations from his Tampa office.
Recognizing that the Patriot Act was a threat, the Islamists were determined to discredit it and its architect, then Attorney General John Ashcroft. Various Islamic groups together with the ACLU, the pro-Castro National Lawyers Guild and waged a national campaign against the Patriot Act, and Ashcroft left his position early in Bush’s second term.
Norquist was part of the coalition to rescind the Patriot Act and also behind efforts to abolish a section of the 1996 Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act permitting “secret evidence.” With secret evidence, prosecutors can withhold classified information from foreign suspects if authorities have reason to believe the disclosure of such information could compromise the sources and methods through which it was obtained.
Banning secret evidence became an Islamist priority when undisclosed classified information linked Sami al-Arian’s brother-in-law, Mazen al-Najjar, to terrorist activities. In order to keep Islamist financial support, in the second presidential debate with Al Gore, Bush formally pledged that if elected, he would comply and prohibit the use of secret evidence. The pledge complied with Saffuri’s previous suggestion to “mention in public just a few of the issues that concern Arab-Americans.”
Grover Norquist was awarded for being a “champion of the abolishment movement against secret evidence” in July 2001 at an event held by Sami al-Arian called the National Coalition to Protect Political Freedom.
On the morning of September 11, 2001, Islamist groups were reportedly scheduled to meet with President Bush to hear his plan to abolish the secret evidence provision in the Patriot Act. Al-Arian had arranged to participate in the meeting from Florida by telephone. According to his website, his teaching schedule at the University of South Florida would not allow him to be at the White House in person that day.
In February 2003, Sami al-Arian was arrested again, this time charged with being an alleged leader of the Palestine Islamic Jihad (PIJ) in the United States, and Secretary of the “Shura Council,” a worldwide group governing the PIJ. Al-Arian’s attorneys rested without defense. In his ruling, U.S. District Judge Moody criticized al-Arian for doing nothing to stop terrorist bombings perpetrated by Islamic Jihad saying:
“You lifted not one finger. To the contrary, you laughed when you heard of the bombings…You are a master manipulator. The evidence is clear in this case. You were a leader of the PIJ.” 
Sami Al-Arian son, Abdullah, was the subject of national media attention when he was escorted out of the White House event by the Secret Service in June 2001, where al-Arian was one of 150 Muslim-American activists in a White House briefing.
Abdullah’s removal led to a walkout by other attendees at the meeting, who labeled the incident as “racial profiling.” The Deputy Director of the Secret Service issued a written apology to Abdullah, and President Bush personally called Abdullah’s mother to express regret and to promise that nothing like that would happen again.
Probably as a result of Abdullah’s expulsion, the Secret Service was notified that they could provide only physical security possibilities, such as potential assassins. Agents were informed they were not to protect the President from embarrassments such as resulting from meetings with terrorist-apologists, or even from actual terrorists. If unarmed Islamists could find a way to access the President and his subordinates, law enforcement and intelligence professionals understood they could do nothing unless the President’s life was threatened.
In the aftermath of 9/11, Grover Norquist gained access for several individuals and groups as part of Muslim outreach efforts, and established Islamist connections with the Bush administration. A memo dated early in 2001 was an effort to coordinate Muslim and Arab-American public events. Invitees to the White House events were chosen by Norquist’s Islamic Institute.
According to Gaffney, Norquist’s Islamist friends exploited President Bush after 9/11 by sponsoring meetings and hosting White House dinners that only pro-Islamist Muslim-American and Arab-American communities received invitations to, excluding non religious Middle Easterners.
The White House invitation list included key members of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). CAIR’s executive director, Nihad Awad is another self-professed Hamas-supporter and, as will be discussed in a later chapter, harbors a radical agenda. According to Gaffney, The Washington Post featured a photograph of President Bush touring the Washington Islamic Center with Nihad Awad and Khaled Saffuri. As Gaffney put it, the photo was part of a public relations coup that would:
“…exploit the President’s laudable and strategically sensible desire to show that neither he nor the American people would hold all Muslims responsible for the murderous actions of the few.”
Nihad Awad and CAIR continuously opposed Bush’s policies on Homeland Security and the War on Terror. They even sued Attorney General Ashcroft and FBI Director Robert Moeller.
The White House invitation list also included Shaykh Hamza Yusuf, who had attended a rally two days prior to 9/11 to support a former AMC executive, Jamil Al-Amin, former Black Panther currently serving a life sentence for killing a policeman. Al-Amin converted to Islam when he was in prison from 1971-1976 for robbery. At the rally Shaykh Yusuf declared,
“This country is facing a terrible fate…This country stands condemned. It stands condemned because of what it did – and lest people forget Europe suffered two world wars after conquering the Muslim lands” 
“What it did” implies guilt, but states absolutely nothing. Could it mean that Hitler was working in Islamic interests in WWII? After all, Hitler had Islamic allies in WWII, and he raised an army of 20,000 Bosnian Muslims.
Nevertheless, Gaffney wrote that shortly after 9/11, the FBI went to Yusuf’s house to question him about the attack on the World Trade Center. Yusuf’s wife informed the agents that Yusuf was not home because he was meeting with the President. The FBI checked out her story and found that Yusuf had attended an “inter-religious” meeting in the Oval Office arranged by Suhail Khan as Grover Norquist’s White House stand-in. 
In September 2001, Muzammil Siddiqi, the president of the Board of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), was also on the White House invitation list. With deep ties to Saudi Arabia, Siddiqi was previously a top figure in the Muslim World League (MWL), whose American headquarters were raided in March 2002 on suspicion of ties to terrorism during the U.S. government’s Operation Green Quest. He was Chairman of the Religious Affairs Committee of the Muslim Students Association in the U. S. and Canada, and a member of the Fiqh Council, another organization that has been raided. 
Siddiqi opposes Muslims serving in the U.S. military or defending the United States. Siddiqi said in an article entitled, “Basic Principles of Involvement in War in Islam,” in 1991.
“Islam will not allow a Muslim to be drafted by non-Muslims to defend concepts, ideologies, and values other than those of Islam…A Muslim shall not defend non-Muslim lands.”
Siddiqi wrote in 1996 of his desire for the United States to become a Muslim country through “gradual change,” and said that Islamic Shari’ah Law should become America’s law.
“Allah’s rules have to be established in all lands, and all our efforts should lead to that direction.”
At the inter-religious prayer service for the 9/11, victims held at the National Cathedral on September 14, 2001, Siddiqi would not condemn terrorism in statements heard worldwide. 
Siddiqi was later photographed with President Bush in the Roosevelt Room of the White House as he presented him with a Koran.
The invitation list included Agha Saeed, founder and president of the American Muslim Alliance (AMA). Saeed created the American Muslim Political Coordination Council (AMPCC), an umbrella group to unite the American Muslim Council (AMC), the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), and the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC).
Eric Erfan Vickers, a black radical American attorney on the invitation list had converted to the Islam. He was affiliated with several Wahabbi groups before he was the AMC executive director from June 2002 until February 2003. In defense of al-Arian, Vickers declared
“What has happened to professor Arian…is happening to Muslims and people of Middle Eastern descent all over this country. They are being discriminated against.” 
In 2003, Vickers wrote to UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, requesting the organization look into the U.S. government investigation of Muslim groups with possible terrorist ties, referring to the investigation as “un-American practices by the U.S. government.” He wrote,
“I am writing to request that the United Nations begin an immediate inquiry into the political repression of Muslims and Arabs . . . by the United States government.” 
Mahdi Bray, also on the list of what Gaffney described as the “Wahhabi Lobby” was usually as a coordinator for political activism. By mid-October of 2003, Bray had overseen the training of nearly 1,000 Islamic activists. Bray leads several pro-Islamist organizations in America, and is a former member of the radical Students for a Democratic Society (SDS). He hosts a radio talk show that reflects the views of, and is sponsored largely by Wahhabi Saudi Arabia.
In November 2003, some of the above Muslim groups were finally excluded from the White House invitation list dinner, presumably due to the arrests of their associates. Gaffney wrote that the ISNA, CAIR, the Muslim Public Affairs Council, the Muslim Students Association and several other Wahhabi-backed groups and individuals then depreciated the White House events as:
“…the events were nothing more than props shamelessly used by the Bush Administration.”
After the exclusion of the groups, the FBI Director and supervisory agents continued to meet with representatives of the AMC, CAIR and ISNA, even though associates of each had been the object of law enforcement action. The FBI had once allowed the groups to provide sensitivity training to FBI agents in Quantico, Virginia. The “community outreach,” program has allowed Islamists to gain power and influence in America while exploiting their relationships with U.S. Federal agencies. 
With less than 3% of America’s population Muslim, there is still an Islamic dinner at the White House every year. More recently there is a USPS stamp and the State Department has a new publication called “Being Muslim in America.” America was not founded on Islam yet the White House officially endorses Islam at the taxpayer’s financial, political, social, and religious expense.
 “American Government Officials And Politicians are Interested In Islam,” http://www.riseofislam.com/islam_in_america_04a.html
 Rabinowitz, Beila & Mayer, William; “State Department Funding ISNA’s Propagation of Islam via Citizen Exchange Program,” April 25, 2008, http://www.militantislammonitor.org/article/id/3442
 “Lawsuit’s Claim: CAIR No Longer Even Exists,” November 24, 2008, http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=81925
 “The Sheik and the Secretary of State,” National Corruption Index.org, January 12, 200,9 http://forum.thedailyshow.com/tds/board/message?board.id=guest-suggestions&thread.id=557
 “Ex-Professor get 4 Years in South Florida Case,” May 1, 2006 http://news.oneindia.in/2006/05/01/ex-professor-gets-over-4-years-in-florida-jihad-case-1146512148.html
 Hanna Rosin and John Mintz, “Muslim Leaders Struggle With Mixed Messages,” Washington Post, October 2, 2001
 “Bosnian Muslims Volunteer En Masse Into Nazi SS,”
 Jonathan Kaufman, “Islamerican: Meet Hamza Yusuf, ‘Rock Star’ of a Leader Among U.S. Muslims,” The Wall Street Journal, February 15, 2002
 “Guest CV: Dr. Muzammil H. Siddiqi,” IslamOnline.net, http://www.islamonline.net/livedialogue/english/Guestcv.asp?hGuestID=uY6w39
 “Guest CV: Dr. Muzammil H. Siddiqi,” IslamOnline.net, http://www.islamonline.net/livedialogue/english/Guestcv.asp?hGuestID=uY6w39.
 Schlussel, Debbie; Adam’s Gadahn’s Extremist American Imam,” May 28, 2004 http://www.debbieschlussel.com/columns/column052804.shtml
 Charles Krauthammer, “The Silent Imams,” Washington Post, November 23, 2001
 Segment entitled, “Should FBI Director Robert Mueller deliver the keynote address to the American Muslim Council tomorrow?” Hardball with Chris Matthews, MSNBC, June 27, 2002
 “ Eric Erfan Vickers,” A Guide to the Political Left http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=751
 Gaffney, Frank; “A Troubling Influence,” December 9, 2003, http://www.frontpagemag.com/articles/Read.aspx?GUID=C7CD908B-6D7E-49EB-A0A9-DA0A18745A29
The Bush Dhimmi Doctrine
Many Americans proclaim that President Bush successfully protected America from terrorism after September 11, 2001. Even though terrorists did not attack U.S. soil again after 9/11, Bush’s policy allowed terrorists to infiltrate and harm America with a strategy that is leading to our self-destruction. Bush’s, “war on terror” was based on a premise that defers terrorism to “a few” extremists, not the Islamic doctrine itself. The premise was, and still is, that Islam is somehow reformable after being given a bad reputation.
The Bush dhimmi doctrine endorsed Islam as “peaceful” even though Bush acknowledged that slaughtering and intimidation of non-Muslims had become a global pandemic. This includes good Muslims fighting bad Muslims as in Iraq and Afghanistan. But to protect the lives of American citizens and keep oil flowing into the U.S., Bush dutifully spoke of a peaceful Islam.
A 2007 article titled “Bush Administration Moves to Legitimize the Muslim Brotherhood,” by William Mayer and Beila Rabinowitz, reported that the Bush Administration’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research hosted a meeting to discuss opening more formal channels to the Islamic “brothers.”
President Bush named Iran, Iraq and North Korea the “Axis of evil” because of the part they played in helping terrorism and ability to obtain weapons of mass destruction. It is interesting that he did not include Saudi Arabia as a part of the Axis of evil even though 9/11 terrorists were Saudis funded by Saudis, and Osama Bin Laden is a Saudi terrorist who is from a prominent Saudi family.
It is telling that Saudi Arabians (supposedly our friends) are mostly Wahabbi-Sunnis, and Iranians (supposedly not our friends) are mostly Shiite. The two countries, close to the same size, compete for power in the Persian Gulf. America has taken sides with the Saudis because they have more oil which we buy from them, and as a result they have acquired enormous strategic investments in the world and in American market and financial system. In other words, they pull the strings and we react. In a visit to Saudi Arabia in May 2008, Bush discussed a civilian nuclear deal with Saudi King Abdullah, reportedly part of an effort to protect the kingdom’s vast oil reserves, pipeline distribution system, and borders, allowing the Saudi’s to join a global initiative to combat nuclear terrorism, enhance the protection of nuclear systems, and improve detection and confiscation of illegally held nuclear material.
Bill Warner, who runs the online newsletter, “Bulletin of Cultural Annihilation,” wrote about the Bush Islamic Doctrine, defining “dhimmis” as non-Muslims who apologize for Islam, such as the media, willing professors, financiers, preachers, priests, politicians, pundits and rabbis, George Bush, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, and Barrack Obama.
Dhimmitude effectively disallows the truth of Islamic history, denies the way Islam is presented in the Koran, and denies a Koran based manifesto of Islamic aggression. Attributing Islam to the terror and horrible murders would certainly incite more hate from terrorist murderers and their proponents. In highly promoted interfaith dialogues, religious leaders meet and claim they worship the same god. However, the Christian and Jewish leaders have not actually read the Koran. Without reading it, one cannot claim to know anything about the Koran. Furthermore, merely reading the Koran does not prove that its revelations are from the God of Judaism and Christianity.
Responding to a barbaric Islamic act, a dhimmi will predictably reply that Christians have done bad things, too….and there is violence in the Bible too. A dhimmi will defend a doctrine they know virtually nothing about, saying such as “jihadists are fundamentalist radicals but most Muslims are just like everybody else” and, “I know a Muslim who is nice.” A dhimmi believes that just because he thinks a Muslim is nice to him, then Islam is good. Afraid to challenge a Muslim for fear of being called Islamophobic or unfair, a dhimmi would rather not hear historic evidence that is uncomfortable. A dhimmi does not initially realize that he is being set up to accept and apppologize for Islam. Believing Islam is peaceful enables stealth jihad through deception, intimidation, policy, and other methods.
The media does not admit the extent that pure Islam is involved in terror attacks. For example, the 2009 incident in Mumbai, India was motivated by Islam but Muslims were never mentioned.
Real “terror” distracts us from seeing the other terror-less, stealth, or “peaceful” forces of jihad. Bill Warner lists sword, pen, tongue and money as the four forms of jihad. The State Department relies on indoctrination through the so-called peaceful methods for the gradual Islamization of America.
President George W. Bush made it clear when he entered office that he opposed efforts to secure our nation’s borders. His guest worker amnesty programs encouraged the greatest influx of illegal aliens in the history of our nation. While the majority of people who migrate to the United States may simply want a better life and hope to become loyal Americans, there are many others who are motivated with a desire to harm our nation.
Today terrorists can easily penetrate our borders, embed in mainstream society, build compounds, and access weapons of mass destruction that can cause hundreds of thousands of American deaths. The 9/11 Commission staff report on terrorist travel stated it had identified numerous entry and embedding tactics associated with earlier attacks in the United States. The report revealed that prior to September 11, 2001, abuse of the immigration system and a lack of interior immigration enforcement unwittingly worked together to support terrorist activity. The 2000 census estimated 8 million illegal aliens in the United States. Today that number is estimated to be over 13 million, with around 7 million of them in the workforce.
That total includes individuals who entered the United States without proper documentation and those who entered legally but overstayed or violated their visas or terms of entry. The threat of Muslim fundamentalist attacks is not the only price to pay for unsecured borders. Illegal immigration affects education, the economy, health care, the environment, criminal justice and national security. Not withstanding that reports indicate that illegal aliens in the U.S. have a crime rate two and a half times that of legal aliens and account for around 30% of the inmate population in federal correctional institutions.
Americans are losing jobs at an unprecedented rate while illegal immigration reportedly costs taxpayers billions of dollars each year. Because many immigrants are poor, increasing numbers add to the burden of disadvantaged groups. An estimated cost of illegal immigration is approximately $340 billion dollars a year. As an alternative, The National Policy Institute estimates the cost of mass deportation for all of the illegal immigrants would be between $206 and $230 billion.
In 2005, four to five million illegal aliens entered the U.S. at our Southern Borders. The number reportedly includes as many as 19,500 illegal aliens from terrorist countries. Millions of pounds of drugs, cocaine, meth, heroin and marijuana also crossed into the U. S from the Southern border.
Due to lack of staff personnel and detention facilities, Islamists and potential terrorists can enter the U.S. legally because applications are not always checked for fraud or potential terror connections. Potential terrorists can also obtain student visas to enter the country and stay indefinitely, knowing the Federal Government will likely never search for them if they overstay their visas. By September 11, 2001, visa’s of three of the 9/11 hijackers had lapsed, thus they were in the country illegally, even though all nineteen had entered legally.
The Bush dhimmi doctrine did not prevent the operation of thirty-five potential terrorist training camps in the U.S. The compounds are believed to be run by Sheik Mubarak Ali Gilani, who is known for allegedly setting up journalist Daniel Pearl in 2002. Daniel Pearl was abducted on the way to meet with Gilani, and eventually beheaded.
Reported in an interview between Sean Hannity of Fox News and Martin Mawyer of Christianaction.Org, Sheik Gilani is reportedly a direct descendant of Mohammed, and his followers believe Gilani speaks for Allah. The interview between Mawyer and Hannity revealed that though the group claims to be peaceful, they appear to have a sinister agenda. A videotape uncovered by the Christian Action Network was titled “The Soldiers of Allah.” It features Sheikh Gilani teaching American followers guerilla warfare tactics such as scaling mountains, subduing enemies, murdering guards, hijacking cars, kidnapping, weapons training, and setting off explosives. Sheik Gilani is reportedly quoted as saying:
“We are fighting to destroy the enemy. We are dealing with evil at its roots and its roots are America.”
Explaining how to kill American Infidels, Gilani reportedly said:
“Act like you are his friend. Then kill him.”
Sheik Gilani’s thirty-five communities extend from New York, to South Carolina, to Seattle, Washington, and Texas. The compounds are owned by a Pakistani based group, Jumaatul-Fuqra, otherwise known as Muslims of America in the U.S. When Mr. Mawyer’s organization investigated, they learned that the group is allowed to continue primarily because they are protected by state constitutions and the U.S. Constitution. Mawyer said that “law enforcement hands are tied in trying to shut these groups down,” even though local field officers believe the group has weapons of mass destruction.
Hezbollah members are known to be raising money in the U.S., and have long been believed to be bringing suite case dirty booms into the U.S. to await further instructions. Across the border, Hezbollah in Mexico is believed to train Mexican drug cartels in gorilla terror tactics. Reportedly, the Mexican drug cartels have adopted the terrorist tactics of kidnappings and beheadings.
Islamic terrorists sell cocaine from Afghanistan to the Mexican drug cartels, and pass profits on to Hezbollah and other Islamic terrorist groups. An anonymous Mexican Army officer said that Hezbollah is believed to be teaching the Mexican drug cartel the art of bomb making. An anonymous U.S. law enforcement official confirmed that forensic evidence ties Hezbollah bomb experts to roadside explosions in Iraq. In Mexico, police stations and government buildings are at risk of the terrorist training designed to combat the Mexican Army, Mexican Police, American Special Forces and DEA agents. News reports have confirmed that effects of the terrorist training are beginning to be seen throughout Mexico and the bordering U.S. states.
Homeland Security has said that Hezbollah members already operating in the U.S. probably have contact with other Hezbollah members in Mexico and around the world.
Mexican deaths linked to organized crime grew historically in 2008. The first one thousand deaths occurred by around April 14; the next one thousand by July 2; reaching 3000 by September 10, and 4000 by October 28. At the end of 2008, 6000 deaths were linked to organized crime.
Texas officials reported that dozens of individuals wounded in the Mexican state of Chihuahua are treated in an El Paso hospital. From Texas to California, drug-related dangers and violence is so high that Mexico is off-limits to U.S. Military personnel. Americans who normally cross the border to travel, shop and conduct business, no longer feel safe in Mexico. 
ABC News reported in early February 2009 that Phoenix, Arizona had become the kidnapping capital of America. Phoenix reportedly has more incidents than any other city outside of Mexico City. The Phoenix Police Chief, Andy Anderson said that the transgressions are a result of Mexico’s drug cartels expanding into the U.S. The report revealed that over 370 kidnappings occurred in Phoenix in 2008, with many of them connected to Mexico’s drug cartels as criminal activities have spilled over the U.S.-Mexico border. The report revealed that ransoms not paid promptly result in “horrific cases of chopped-off hands, legs and heads.” 
Human trafficking has also become widespread as a result of lax immigration enforcement. The Department of State estimates are that between 18,000 and 20,000 victims are trafficked into the United States each year. Since 2001, more than 20 percent of the human trafficking victims have been found in Texas. 
The Bush administration did not hire enough special agents for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or enough Border Patrol agents for years. In a March 2005, a hearing titled “Interior Immigration Enforcement Resources,” before the Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, testimony by the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Robert S. Mueller, addressed the urgent border issue:
“In 2004, we learned that operatives had conducted detailed surveillance of financial targets in New York, Washington, D.C., and New Jersey . . . a sobering reminder of the threat we continue to face…There is the threat from covert operatives who may be inside the U.S. who have the intention to facilitate or conduct an attack. I remain very concerned about what we are not seeing. Efforts by extremists to obtain training inside the U.S. is also an ongoing concern.”
Lack of agency funding severely undermines the national objective to not have to fight the war on terror inside America. Testimony at the 2005 hearing stressed that illegal immigrants are often released into the U.S. because sufficient funds to detain and hold them were not allocated in a timely manner, even though Congress had authorized the funds. Without sufficient detention facilities, non-Mexican detainees released on their own recognizance were ordered to appear at deportation hearings weeks later. The number of released illegal immigrants who did not return was in the hundreds per week.
Employer sanctions were abandoned because of inadequate numbers of detention beds and a lack of ICE Agents during the Bush administration. According to information from the Congressional Research Service, in 2004 alone the U.S. Border Patrol released 35,000 detainees described as “other than Mexican” due to a shortage of beds.
The Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 authorized 800 new ICE investigators for 2006 through 2010, however, President Bush’s initial budget only requested funding for 143 new ICE investigators for 2006. Lack of funding also led to cancellation of ICE academy training in the latter part of 2005, affecting training for approximately 900 immigration and enforcement employees.
In 2004, Congress provided funding to hire 2,000 new Border Patrol agents with an additional 2,000 new Border Patrol agents for each of the next 4 years, to bring the total to 10,000. Leading to what would become a crisis, Bush and his administration significantly reduced the number of new Border Patrol agents from 2000-2004 to 210.
In 2006, President Bush announced he would hire 6,000 additional Border Patrol agents before he left office. To meet those numbers, agents were hastily hired with reduced training. Though the agency was on its way to meeting the president’s goal before he was ready to leave office in 2008, The National Border Patrol Council criticized a hasty last minute hiring process, with resulting reduced educational requirements, shortened training periods and inadequate screening. The agency’s union president, T.J. Bonner said:
“They want the best and the brightest, but they’re going about it in the wrong way…They’re rolling the dice with our homeland security.”
When the U.S. Homeland Security Department’s Office of the Inspector General conducted 79 investigations into corruption among federal agents along the border in 2007, they found cases had risen from 31 in 2003 to some 200 cases by July 2008.
A justifiable concern is that the hasty hiring process provided for criminals and terrorists to obtain sensitive positions. If the Bush administration had immediately and effectively used all the funds allocated by Congress, the eligibility of new Border Patrol agents might not have become an issue.
Another very serious threat to American’s security is bringing in displaced Muslims from war-torn countries under the guise of “humanitarianism.” For nearly a decade, Bill Clinton and George Bush have systematically imported Muslims, by tens of thousands per year for each group. The Bush administration flew 1,000 Iraqi refugees into America every 30 days in 2008 alone. It is estimated that another 17,000 Iraqis arrived in 2009. These immigrants are comprised of Sunni and Shiite Muslims adversaries that have battled and killed each other for hundreds of years. The 1990 census counted only 2,070 immigrant Somalis in the U.S. Since then, hundreds thousands of Muslim Somali immigrants have also arrived in the United States. The U.S. provides for their immigration, supposedly proving compassion for the disadvantaged Muslims. What is contradictory is that we then bend our policy to accommodate their way of life—which is what they left or fled in the first place. Because accommodation encourages propagation of Islam to the extent of affecting American freedoms and traditions, an agenda beyond compassion is clear.
Seventeen Chinese Muslims terrorists known as Uighurs captured in Afghanistan living at the U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay since 2002 have admitted to receiving weapon training from the Taliban. Being held pending efforts at resettlement, the Uighurs were cleared for release in 2004, but the Bush administration could not find another country that was willing to accept them. The Chinese call them terrorists and some fear that if they return to China, they will be tortured. Other countries fear reprisal from China if they accept them.
In October 2008, U.S. District Judge Ricardo Urbina, a Bill Clinton appointee, ordered their immediate release into Washington D.C. stating he did not “understand why that would not be a viable option.” Prior to the decision, Justices voted 5-4 to allow Islamic terrorists held in Guantanamo the right to challenge their detention by filing habeas corpus petitions in American federal courts.
Prior to Urbina’s ruling, a Chinese Foreign Ministry representative said that the Uighurs are thought to be members of the East Turkestan Islamic Movement. The group is recognized as a terrorist organization by the U.S. government. And the Bush administration said the Chinese terrorists are a national security threat. The Bush administration, along with millions of Americans, stood against Urbina’s decision. The district court’s ruling could be used as precedent for other Guantanamo Bay detainees including those suspected of planning the 9/11 attacks. This means that if Obama closes Guantanamo, many more Islamic terrorists could end up in the U.S. In fact, now that Obama is president, he wants to move detainees to Michigan, where they could be eligible for a jury of their peers, and where a high percentage of Muslims have settled.
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia noted that our nation is at war with radical Islamists, therefore the ruling would make the war more difficult on Americans, and could lead to more American deaths. 
So far the release efforts have been unsuccessful because the court lacks authority to direct the government to bring them to the U.S., however the Uighurs no longer have restricted conditions.
A September 2005 report titled “Immigration and Terrorism: Moving Beyond the 9/11 Staff report on Terrorist Travel,” reviewed the immigration histories of 94 terrorists who operated in the United States from the early 1990s through 2004. The report findings show widespread terrorist violations of immigration laws, and describe how terrorists in the country use weaknesses in the system to remain in America.
Fraud is often used to gain entry into the U.S., and to remain in the country. In some instances, terrorists claimed they lack proper travel documents and applied for asylum at their port of entry. Some terrorists acquire various forms of fake identification, including driver’s licenses, birth certificates, Social Security cards, and immigration arrival records. Once in the United States, they can become legal permanent residents, and often marry Americans in sham marriages. Through various means, terrorists can easily become naturalized U.S. citizens.
Terrorists in America understand they can easily embed themselves in U.S. communities and carry out operations related to terrorism and espionage. In addition to physically attacking our nation, terrorists in the U.S. can gather intelligence, establish “safe houses” and generate funds to enable their terrorist organizations to conduct operations around the world. They are able to acquire jobs that provide them with access to critical infrastructure such as federal agencies, airports, seaports, border crossings, nuclear power plants, and military bases. They obtain positions for contractors that work with the federal government and the United States military. They work in our meat and food processing plants. They can also work at water processing plants, enabling access to America’s food and water supply.
The fourteenth Annual Arab International Festival, 2009 drew some 250,000 attendees. Sponsored by the Ford Motor Company, the American Arab Chamber of Commerce, the FBI, the CIA and various branches of the U.S. Armed Forces, the event was a recruiting ground for all branches of the U.S. Military. Army, Navy, Marines, and Air Force recruiters promised American citizenship to every Middle-Eastern immigrant who enlisted– under the condition that they were Muslim. “The United States Army” in Arabic script adorned G.I. issued uniforms. The FBI set up a booth to recruit Muslim agents, and the CIA conducted raffles to entice young Islamists.
Muslims were not prohibited from distributing and selling Islamic books and materials at the festival but Christians who dared to attend the festival were prohibited by law from distributing religious materials pursuant to an order prior to the event from U.S. District Judge Nancy Edmonds. Dearborn police kept watch for Christians who might violate the ruling even though Christians have never disrupted the event in the past.
Some of the army recruits were sent to Ft. Hood in Texas where Major Nidal Hasan was stationed.
Major Nidal Hasan, an Army Major serving as a Psychiatrist was one of around 40 Muslims stationed on Ft. Hood, and 15,000 Muslims in the military fired on 43 fellow soldiers, killing 13 as he cried “Allahu Akbar.” Major Hasan, who claimed to be “a Muslim first and an American second,” had previously said that “Muslims should stand up and fight the aggressor,” and “Muslims had a right to attack” yet apologists for Islam dhimmis were quick to claim his murderous action was were not really Islamic.
Hassan completed residency at Walter Reed Army Hospital where his ideology was well known. He had worshipped at the same mosque in 2001 as two of the 9/11 hijackers and once gave a lecture to doctors at Walter Reed saying that non-Muslims should be beheaded and have boiling oil poured down their throats. Colleagues questioned his loyalty but were hesitant to complain because of political correctness.
In May 2007, six men were arrested for plotting to attack Fort Dix with assault weapons. Albanian Muslim immigrants from the Balkans were convicted in December of conspiring to target Fort Dix in the crime inspired by al-Qaida, proving that jihadists do plot inside America.  They said their ideology and hatred for America was the motivation for their plot to kill U.S. soldiers.  The men were brothers who had lived illegally in the U.S. after they crossed the border through Mexico in 1984.
An American black convert to Islam shot 24 year-old soldier Pvt. William Long, and wounded 18 year-old Pvt. Quinton Ezeagwula. Investigators believed the shooting specifically targeted military personnel, and motivated by political and religious views.
The story of a young woman from Lebanon provides an excellent example of a terrorist infiltrating the FBI and the CIA. Nada Nadim Prouty entered the U.S. on a student visa, which expired in 1988. She overstayed her visa and obtained resident alien status through a fraudulent marriage, which enabled her to successfully gain U.S. citizenship. After becoming a naturalized citizen, she used her fluency in foreign languages to get a job as an FBI special agent. Her FBI position led to a position for the CIA before it was discovered that she had used her security clearance to access database information on Hezbollah. Prouty provided classified information to Hezbollah through her brother-in-law, Talal Chahin.
An investigation revealed that Chahin, who allegedly laundered over $20 million to Hezbollah through his Michigan restaurant chain, had arranged Pouty’s fraudulent marriage. Investigations revealed that Prouty had disclosed the sensitive information to Chahin on three investigations in which he was involved.
Prouty’s family in Lebanon is noted for its involvement with the Syrian National Socialist Party, which has the objective of forming a greater Arab state that will include Lebanon, Syria, Israel, Cypress and part of Turkey. Intelligence sources revealed that Prouty’s cousin, Nidal Al-Aouar, was a terrorist who set roadside car bombs in Lebanon on behalf of Syria after training North Korea and the old USSR. 
Roy Bailey, a Detroit field office director for Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, enabled Prouty’s fraudulent activities. Charged in September 2008 with defrauding the federal government, conspiracy to commit bribery, and failing to report a felony, Bailey enabled a wide range of fraudulent activities that included immigration fraud, preferential treatment, and benefits in exchange for gifts and cash from a range of restaurant owners, attorneys, and business owners that included Talal Chahin.
The immigration problem directly affects the rights and lives of individual Americans. Roger Barnett, an Arizona rancher, caught 12,000 illegal immigrants crossing his ranch from 1998-2004. When he caught immigrants crossing his property he turned them over to the border Patrol. A March 2004 incident involving sixteen illegal immigrants led to a civil suit when Mexicans trespassers filed charges against Barnett claiming that their civil rights had been violated. The Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDE) represented the group of illegal Mexican immigrants charging that they had endured emotional distress as Mr. Barnett held them at gunpoint and threatened to turn his dog on them. The suit also charged the Sherriff of Cochise County for not stopping Mr. Barnett as he allegedly yelled obscenities at the immigrants and kicked a woman during the incident. Mr. Barnett said that over the years, illegal immigrants had left behind a trail of garbage including used toilet paper, soiled diapers and plastic bottles. He said that they had destroyed his property, broken into his house, torn up water pumps, stolen trucks, and left garbage that led to the death of some of Barnett’s cattle. 
Mr. Barnett was a crime victim who was treated as a criminal in efforts to protect his property. The immigrants filed suit against Mr. Barnett for $32,000,000. Barnett’s attorney argued that illegal immigrants do not have the same rights as citizen, but U.S. District Judge John Roll refused to drop the charges.
In February 2008, a civil jury found that Roger Barnett did not violate the civil rights of the trespassers, rejecting their claims of battery and false imprisonment. Mr. Barnett was however ordered to pay $77,804 in damages, of which $60,000 were punitive. Five of the plaintiffs were living in the U.S. with visa applications at the time of the verdict.
Lack of immigration scrutiny and enforcement also affects legal immigrants in tragic circumstances. Legal immigrants who sincerely wish to leave their former countries behind to live in a free, Democratic society, may still be victims of barbaric religious practices when our laws fail to protect them. Examples include Middle Eastern women and children who want to be free of oppressive Islamic laws.
A heartbreaking incident took place in Irving, Texas in early 2008. Amina and Sarah Said were teenage girls who attended American schools and had American friends even though their father resented American laws and culture. When their father, Yaser Said, found out the girls had boyfriends, he shot and killed them in the back of a taxi before he fled the country.
In another deplorable case, Aasiya Hassan, a beautiful Middle Eastern woman was stabbed and decapitated in Orchard Park, New York on February 12, 2009 after she had filed for a divorce and obtained an order of protection from her husband, Muzzammil Hassan. Mr. Hassan was an influential member of the local Muslim community who founded the English speaking Islamic Bridges TV in 2004, reportedly in an effort “to help portray Muslims in a more positive light.”
After arriving in the U.S. at the age of fourteen from Pakistan, Mr. Hassan reportedly graduated magna cum laude in 1996 with an MBA from the University of Rochester in 1996, and went on to become a successful banker in Buffalo, New York. 
Hassan had expressed concerns that Hollywood does not portray moderate Muslims accurately. He said “Bridges TV gives American Muslims a voice and will depict them in everyday, real life situations.”
The Bush dhimmi doctrine kept us safe from terrorism because Bush was a good dhimmi. He managed the appearance of having zero tolerance for terrorism, but he did not or could not distinguish between terrorism and jihad, specifically jihad through non-violence. By encouraging Americans to believe that the events of 9/11 were caused by only a few random terrorists, he shifted the real source of terror, the ideology of Islam as it is written in the Koran, to a few crazed lunatics and fringe groups. Believing that Islam is really peaceful is an effective strategy that allows Islam to advance stealthily so American citizens will not notice and therefore not oppose a gradual takeover. It is easier to enforce Islam through dhimmitude even if it is met with some skepticism and reluctance, rather than have to resort to terror. In other words, it is easier if you just hand a thief your pocketbook, however reluctant, rather than fighting and possibly losing your life. You only hand him your pocketbook because you know that if you do not, he will try to kill you.
Also, as long as we allow foreign Muslims to immigrate to America and appease them by accommodating their religious “needs,” and continue to buy oil from the Middle East, we will potentially be a dhimmi nation. We must reclaim our sovereignty by immediately closing the borders, drilling in America, and charging the Middle Easterners for drilling and processing their oil for them.
 Schroeder, Jen; “Why President Bush Embraces Islam as Peaceful,” July 26, 2004, http://www.blessedcause.org/PressRelease/Bush%20Islam.htm
 Rabinowitz, Beila & Mayer, William “Bush Administration Moves To Legitimize The Muslim Brotherhood?,” June 22, 2007, http://www.pipelinenews.org/index.cfm?page=brotherhood62107.htm
 Stearns, Scott; “Bush in Saudi Arabia for Nuclear Deal,” May 16, 2008, http://www.voanews.com/english/archive/2008-05/2008-05-16-voa23.cfm?CFID=328291575&CFTOKEN=23879274&jsessionid=de301739bcf88ea56c1d3b322c2535541f40
 “$800 Billion Economic Stimulus and Job Creation Bill Includes No Protections for U.S. Workers,” March 2009 http://www.fairus.org/site/PageNavigator/issues/stimulus_includes_no_protections
 “The Facts, Just the Facts, Ma’am!,” http://www.federalobserver.com/archive.php?aid=11746
 “Frightening Film on U.S. Training Camps,” February 17, 2009, http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,494424,00.html
 Webster, Michael; “Mexican Drug Cartels and Hezbollah Operating in Mexico and the U.S.,” October 26, 2009, http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/79021
 Ross, Brian; Esposito Richard; and Elocker, Asa; “Kidnapping Capital of the U.S.A.,” February 11, 2009, http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=6848672&page=1
“Interior Immigration Enforcement Resources,” Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims of the Committee on the Judiciary; House of Representatives 109th Congress, 1st Session, March 10, 2005, Serial no. 109–5 http://commdocs.house.gov/committees/judiciary/hju99785.000/hju99785_0f.htm
 Separ, Jerry; “Border Chief Wins Bonus Despite Criticism,” January 8, 2009, http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jan/08/border-chief-wins-bush-bonus-despite-hits-by-ranks/?page=2
 Roebuck, Jeremy; “Border Patrol Union Criticizes Agency’ Hiring, Training Push” July 4, 2008, http://www.themonitor.com/news/border_14082___article.html/agency_training.html
 Cutler, Michael; “Bush Opposed all Efforts to Secure Border” January 10, 2009, http://www.newswithviews.com/Cutler/michael144.htm
 Wooldridge, Frosty; “Absurd To The Insane: Muslim Immigration Into The USA,” November 24, 2008
 Brown, Floyd and Mary Beth; “Judge Rules Terrorist Prisoners Be Released In Nation’s Capital,” Saturday, October 11, 2008
 Williams, Dr. Paul; FBI, CIA, Fund Gala Islamic Festval, July 12, 2009, http://thelastcrusade.org/2009/07/12/fbi-cia-fund-gala-islamic-festival/
 World Net Daily Staff, “Military Jihadists Fill Every Branch of U.S. Military,” November 6, 2009, http://www.israelunitycoalition.org/news/article.php?id=4744
 McCabe, Scott, “Fort Hood Gunman Worked at Walter Reed,” November 9, 2009, http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/nation/Local-psychiatrist-ID_d-as-Fort-Hood-gunman-worked-at-Walter-Reed-8492041-69339237.html
 Allen, Nick; “Fort Hood Gunman Had Told Colleagues That Infidels Should Have Their Throats Cut,” November 8, 2009, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/6526030/Fort-Hood-gunman-had-told-US-military-colleagues-that-infidels-should-have-their-throats-cut.html
 Dela Cruz, Christopher; “Three Convicted in Fort Dix Terror Plot are Sentenced to Life,” April 28, 2009, http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2009/04/judge_sentences_fort_dix_defen.html
 Dela Cruz, Christopher; “Three Convicted in Fort Dix Terror Plot are Sentenced to Life,” April 28, 2009, http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2009/04/judge_sentences_fort_dix_defen.html
 Erminio, Vanessa; “The Fort Dix Terror Plot,” October 23, 2008, http://blog.nj.com/ledgerarchives/2008/10/the_fort_dix_terror_plot.html
 CNN; “Suspect Arrested in Arkansas Recruiting Center Shooting,” http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/06/01/arkansas.recruiter.shooting/index.html
 Schlussel, Debbie; “Jihad Jane’s Poison Family,” November 20, 2007, http://www.nypost.com/seven/11202007/postopinion/opedcolumnists/jihad_janes_poison_family_955101.htm
 Egan, Paul; “Detroit Immigration Official Who Gave Favors Deserves Prison, Prosecutors Say,” March 6, 2009 http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090306/UPDATE/903060427
 Seper, Jerry; “Sixteen Illegal’s Sue Arizona Rancher,” February 9, 2009, http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/feb/09/16-illegals-sue-arizona-rancher/
 Rotstein, Arthur; “Mixed Verdict Over Migrants’ Run-in With Rancher,” February 17, 2009, http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2009Feb17/0,4670,BorderConfrontation,00.html
 “First American Muslim American Channel Announced by Bridges Network,” http://www.aljazeerah.info/News%20archives/2003%20News%20archives/May%202003%20News/3%20n/First%20American%20Muslim%20Television%20Channel%20Announced%20by%20Bridges%20Network..htm
“Islam in America,” an eight part series by Katie Shaidle is posted at Right Side News.com. With permission I am also posting the series one part at a time.
Part One: An Overview of American Islam
By Kathy Shaidle
RightSideNews Copyright © 2009
Imagine a Super Bowl with all male cheerleaders and half-time prayers. In that America, they drink Jihad Cola instead of Coke and thank Allah when they win an Oscar.
Luckily, that America is fictional, one vividly described in Robert Ferrigno’s 2006 futuristic novel, Prayers for the Assassin, set in 2040. But is it really so hard to imagine, in a world in which a man named “Barack Hussein Obama” can get elected President just a few years after Muslim hijackers destroyed the world’s tallest buildings in the heart of New York City?
Today many Americans are either blissfully ignorant of, or simply indifferent to, the slow, incremental growth of radical Islam in their midst.
We sometimes hear about terrorist cells or suspicious Muslim “compounds” on the news. However, these stories represent merely the tip of an Islamic iceberg that could very well doom America. Not today or tomorrow. But in our lifetimes? That is a real possibility.
And don’t shrug off Islam as “just another religion.” Muslim sharia law deems women to be inferior to men, and allows husbands to “lightly” beat their wives. Polygamy and child bride marriage are condoned and encouraged, due to the example of Mohammed himself, whose many wives included a nine year old. Anti-Semitism and slavery are enshrined in the Koran, as is exploitation of and even violence against all “unbelievers.”
Radical Muslims have learned they don’t require bombs or hijacked airliners to destroy America. They can just use America’s own ideological infrastructure against itself.
Using a kind of ingenious political jujitsu, radical Muslims rely upon everything from the rights to freedom of speech and worship enshrined in the U.S. Constitution to the current atmosphere of hypersensitive political correctness to push their agenda.
For example, the “Islamification” of the educational system is now underway. Textbooks whitewash Islam’s bloody history. Public school children forbidden to pray or recite the Pledge of Allegiance are, however, obliged to play “Muslim for a Day.” Meanwhile, universities eagerly introduce footbaths, Muslim prayer rooms and hallal cafeteria food.
Increasingly, Muslim employees are suing companies for the “right” to refuse to handle “unclean” pork or alcohol, or the “right” to wear headscarves. It is no coincidence that these companies include household names like UPS, Wal-Mart and McDonalds’s – radical Muslims are sending a message to smaller firms who won’t have the means to fight similar suits in the future.
These demands for accommodation extend even behind prison walls, where Muslim prisoners (indoctrinated by Muslim chaplains trained by foreign extremists) insist on getting special treatment as well.
“Lawfare” is on the rise, too. Muslim groups now file expensive, time-consuming lawsuits against critics of Islam, and while these suits are currently confined mostly to Canada and Europe, they have a “chilling” effect on American publishers, writers, journalists and filmmakers. Last year, it only took a couple of threatening emails to persuade a major U.S. publisher to cancel an upcoming novel about Mohammed.
Few Americans realize that their neighborhood mosque was probably built and financed by well-heeled terrorist sympathizers abroad. In fact, 80% of American mosques are Saudi-supported, and serve as safe gathering places for radical imams and dubious “charities” with anti-American agendas.
Islamic terrorism has also found a home on the internet, where (according to one UK think tank) a “virtual caliphate” (or Muslim supremacist empire) thrives, beyond the reach of authorities. The web has become an invaluable arena for radical Muslim recruiting, training, communication and organizing.
Americans looking to the government to protect them from these threats don’t realize that federal agencies in the thrall of political correctness actually undermine the war of terrorism. Few Muslims currently hold public office in the United States, but this may change if Democrats begin to view them as a new source of donations and votes.
Over the next few months, I’ll be your guide to the growth of radical Islam, both at home and abroad. You’ll learn about “moderate” Muslim spokesmen who turn out to be anything but, and meet writers and authors censored by their governments for critiquing the Koran.
I’ll be talking to experts in the fields of intelligence, religion, crime and foreign policy and sharing their insights with you.
Many Americans have already forgotten what happened on 9/11, or simply don’t want to think about it anymore. Our fear, disgust or indifference is exactly what radical Muslims are counting on. As exhausting and demoralizing as it can be to educate ourselves on the facts, we must remember that “the price of freedom is eternal vigilance.”