Pro-Life vs. Pro-Choice Provides a Stealth Step Toward Islamization
The abortion issue is emotional for some and a moral issue for others. Regardless of your view, it is an extremely critical issue. My analysis of a pro-life vs. pro-choice depicts a scenario that illustrates how the issue can ensnare Westerners to unwittingly advance an Islamic government. I believe all Westerners are dangerously unaware of the opportunity for Islamic advancement via the pro-life vs. pro-choice dispute. Please follow me through the article as I present information and examples that may seem irrelevant, but are necessary to understand how and why the pro-life, pro-choice debate provides an excellent opportunity for advancement of the Islamization of America.
Islam has declared war on the West. President Obama’s insistence that America is not in a war with Islam puts us in enormous peril. Knowingly or unknowingly; willingly, or not willingly, our President is part of the Islamic plan to conquer the West, and he will be used to the full extent that his naïveté, ignorance, guilt, or arrogance allows. The same goes for you, my fellow Conservative, Liberal, Christian and Jewish Westerners.
Obama’s birth father was descended from Muslims who had adopted the culture of Islamic Arab invaders in Africa. As a result, regardless of what Obama says or thinks, Muslims will consider him a Muslim. In the Muslim world, one is automatically a Muslim if the father was a Muslim. It does not matter if the father was not a practicing Muslim. If a father was Muslim, the child is one too. If one leaves Islam, it is with the knowledge that apostates are subject to the penalty of death in an Islamic dominated country. Neither does it matter if Obama is a good Muslim, or a bad Muslim. He is useful, and that makes him a “good” enough Muslim. He can even claim to be a Christian and he will still be considered a good Muslim–because he is advancing an Islamic agenda. How is that for hypocrisy? Well, here is some more…
Muslims are against abortion (for themselves). No Muslim woman would ever be allowed to have an abortion. However, this is Jihad, and it is the Western babies that are being aborted. In the perverse duality of Islam, abortion is a tool that diminishes the Western population. Abortion availability also serves as a tool to separate the “guilty” from the “not-guilty” and further in the future, to provide a way to degrade the integrity of those who are “guilty” of having had an abortion.
In our pro-choice society, Muslims simply choose not to have abortions. Abstinence and fidelity (for women) is mandated under the penalty of death in Islam, and the assumption that Shari’ah Law will soon prevail throughout the world.
Muslims often tell non-Muslims that Muhammad stopped the pagan Arabs from burying unwanted baby girls in the sand. It has been disputed that this really happened, but the story advances the Islamic agenda by making Muhammad look like the only humanitarian in a world of wicked evildoers. The story serves to contradict Westerners who tell the truth about Muhammed’s murdurous ways. It also makes some Westerners feel guilty about our values, thus helping to promote the supposed virtues of Islam.
If the story is true about Muhammed “saving” the baby girls from the wicked, pre-Islamic pagan Arabs, the surviving Arab baby girls would have had to live under Islamic rule, marry into polygomous relationships and have more babies as livestock slaves for Allah’s army. The story does not reveal what Muslim armies did to non-Muslim babies in historical slaughters throughout Byzantium and India. Too horrible to describe here, it invalidates the humanitarian approach.
For the past two decades Muslims have been running for political office and actively endorsing candidates of both the Democrat and the Republican parties. Because Obama is a Democrat, is no reason to believe that all Muslims are Democrats. The truth is that Muslims are for Islam, and they will endorse anyone who promotes issues that will further the world wide Islamic caliphate. So, Muslims claim to be both Conservative and Republican in America nowadays. Abduraham Alamoudi gave millions of dollars to Bill Clinton for giving him influence in promoting Islam in American public schools and in appointing Imams within the penal system.
Muslims seek ways to hijack the Republican party as well. After 911, Muslims endorsed Bush II in his second term to the extent that he was willing to ease up on the Patriot Act. An example of actively penetrating the Republican party is by simply calling themselves Republican, thereby making use or the party as a hermit crab would use an empty shell.
An example of the Islamic infiltration into the Republican party is the president of the Dallas-Ft. Worth Islamic Educational Center in Arlington, Texas, Jammal Quadurra. Quadurra is a Muslim who actively disparages Americans who speak out about the dangers of Islamofascism, and expose the motives and methods of the Muslim Brotherhood. Quadurra has spoken harshly about Brigitte Gabriel, founder of ACT! For America, and Dorrie O’Brien, the Grand Prairie, Texas ACT! For America Chapter Leader. Quadurra wrote that “ACT! For America and other hate-mongering organizations are funded by their own victims: poor and ill-informed fellow citizens. Individuals such as Gabriel prey on their fears and manipulate their minds to sell books, make a buck and laugh all the way to the bank.”
Quadurra visciously attacked Robert Bodisch, deputy director of the Texas Governor’s Office of Homeland Security, and the North Central Texas Fusion System– a data sharing system focused on the prevention of accidental and intentional disasters in North Texas. Quadurra’s objection was centered around justifiable concern of Muslim Brotherhood infiltration into the United States, and that Hezbollah and Hamas are training the Mexican drug cartel at the Texas border. Jammal Quadurra is a Republican Party precinct chair in Arlington, Texas, who calls himself a Texan.
To painstakingly describe an example of how the Islamist proponents manipulate words and information, and then cry foul when information is placed in its correct context, I will use a quote from Quadurra in an article where he attempted to discredit Brigitte Gabriel, Robert Bodisch, and the North Central Texas Fusion System. Quadurra wrote in a Texas publication called Star-Telegram:
“Nothing personal, but at the end of the day, it’s all about the money. I urge everyone to check the facts about your safety from the government agencies that are in charge of your safety.”
Quadurra wants us to believe that Brigitte Gabriel, Robert Bodisch, and the North Central Texas Fusion System are manipulating the naive American citizenry for money. However, putting the quote in another context means that Islamists are bribing and extorting our leaders into endorsing Islam.
It also raises the question of how much money Quadurra receives from Arab and Islamic sources for holding his position as the president of the Dallas-Ft. Worth Islamic Educational Center in Arlington, Texas.
It is very important to remember that a Muslim’s guiding principle is that– both short and long term means justify the ends–that everything is relative to achieving Islamic goals. In reality, Muslims are contemptuous of our Democratic two party “man-made government.” Their true loyalties lie with Islamic parties such as Hamas, Fatah, or Hezbollah, and they ultimitely endorse a one-world “Islamic Nation,” also called a “Caliphate.” It is entirely possible that Bush’s open immigration policy was fully endorsed by Muslims in order to get more Muslims into the country. Persuading a candidate to promote the Islamic agenda is entirely possible with sufficient financial contributions, or shall we say, “bribery.”
Getting a President to effect policy that promotes an Islamic agenda may be easier that convincing the American public of the same policy. One way is to infiltrate the Republican and Democratic parties, and promote issues that appeal to either or both parties. For example, Muslims believe they will teach us morality, family values, which are issues that appeals to Conservatives. Within the Democrat party, Muslims will tend to endorse multi-culturalism and diversity because it divides and weakens traditional American values; humanitarianism–insinuating we are a cruel society; immigration and more government spending because it takes away from the taxpayer and bleeds our economy.
The above examples describe how in the future, it will be easy for a Muslim to win an election as a candidate of either party while admitting he/she is a Muslim. With Christianity, Judaism, and “aging white politicians” demonized, a Muslim candidate could run on a platform of multiculturalism, humanitarianism, lowering taxes, and family values. If they make it known that they are personally against abortion, they will have a winning ticket with no further commitment or elaboration required. Liberal voters would vote for them regardless because they do not perceive them as traditional coservatives, and Conservatives would hasten to vote for the pro-life issue.
If a muslim candidate were a man, he could easily win an election in our diverse, multi-cultural, “tolerant” society. If the candidate were a woman it would be even better. A female candidate could get the votes of non-Muslim liberals as well as the votes of women. Christian and Jewish pro-lifers of both sexes would jump from the frying pan into the fire to vote for a person they believe has the same values as themselves regarding abortion, while simultaneously believing they are keeping religion separate from politics.
Of course, in an Islamic dominated country, women do not usually hold public office, (that is unless it advances Islam). But in our current phase of progressive Islamization in America, a Muslim woman could get the camel’s body in the tent (the nose is already in). A woman would also be used as an example to deny all our accused “misconceptions” about women’s rights in Islam. A few terms later, or after the camel has succeeded in getting all the way into the tent (so to speak) , a man would inevitably take over, to the triumph of fundamental Islam. Such is the value of women in Islam!
Jews and Christians should remember that humans are made in God’s image, God gave us free will, and he is forgiving. These concepts are all tenents that Islam denies. The cornerstone of Western society, these concepts are what Islam seeks to eradicate. Therefore, we cannot fall for the imposed “White-guilt” syndrome, which is as much a farce as the derogatory term “Islamophobe.” Both terms represent imposed methods of intimidation, and should be exposed as such.
All free people should remember that removal of free will and a lack of forgiveness are analogous to being a slave for Allah. Forgetting so provides Islamists a golden opportunity to stealthily use deceptive dualism to advance Islam.
Entry filed under: Barack Obama, Christians, Conservatism, Jihad Prevention, Muslims, Obama, Politics, Random, Religion, Sharia Law, Thoughts, Uncategorized. Tags: abortion, Barack Obama, genocide, human rights, Isalm, Islamofascism, Jihad, Jihad Prevention, Modern Day Islam, Politics, pro-choice, pro-life, Religion, Women in Islam, Women's Rights in Islam.