Posts tagged ‘the world bank’
With America’s national debt rising, Anti-Capitalist and anti-Democratic platforms have systematically pushed political correctness, diversity, multiculturalism, and open borders. In an increasingly divided America, globalists welcome influence from foreign powers and immigrants who will give them votes and money, but who have very little interest in being part of our democracy. In this burgeoning new world environment, the Federal Government will soon have the power to put the personal information of all Americans into government databases. Whoever is in control of the government will have access to American’s personal information; school records, business records, medical records, financial records, personal activities, and travel destinations. 
Most Americans think of The Bilderberg Group when they think of a one-world government. Started in 1954 at the Bilderberg Hotel in a small Dutch town called Oosterbeek, the group is reportedly comprised of European prime ministers, American presidents, and the wealthiest of the world who meet in secrecy to discuss the economic and political future of humanity.
The methodology of Saul Alinsky and The Cloward-Piven Strategy provide non-secular methods to achieve a one-world government. In 1966, Columbia University radical professors in New York City, Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven developed their strategy after studying Saul Alinsky. They basically call for the destruction of capitalism by increasing welfare until it collapses the economy, then implementing socialism by nationalizing many private institutions. Later, Hilary Clinton and Barrack Obama also studied Saul Alinsky. The Cloward-Piven Strategy and Saul Alinsky were the inspiration behind ACORN, the organization where President Obama worked as a community organizer.
Saul Alinsky, closely allied with the Chicago Mob in the 1930’s, was a lifelong ally of the Stalin-controlled Communist Party. Alinsky wrote about how to wage a revolution by controlling the masses to achieve change. In his book, “Rules for Radicals,” Alinsky wrote that a community organizer “must first agitate the resentments of the people; fan the latent hostilities to the point of overt expression.” He advocated doing whatever must be done to achieve a goal, clothing it with “moral garments,” and using general benevolent terms for goal phrasing. 
The socialist left advocates using any means possible to eliminate capitalism and create a socialist one-world government to impose “social justice” on all mankind. The Alinsky-style art of deception is a valuable tool they necessarily employ.
The Islamist ultimate goal is to subdue the “infidels” and institute Shari’ah, or Islamic law throughout the world for Allah–by imposing their religion in a totalitarian fashion requiring unwavering obedience. They use an Islamic sanctioned method of deception, called “taquiya” to obtain their goals. With strikingly parallel persuasive methods, both groups seek to crush capitalism and democracy by any means and usher in a One-World Government that would control every aspect of daily life.
Their alliance is summarized by an ancient Arab proverb that says, “The enemy of my enemy is my friend.” Professor Ward Churchill provided an example of the alliance and the influence Islamists have on the left when he asserted that terrorist violence directed against the United States is a morally justifiable response to what he describes as the “rape” and “murder” of other peoples by the U.S. government.
Both the Islamists and the radical left aim to overthrow the existing order to create their vision of peace on earth. They both believe that the ends justify the means and any alliance is a means, however temporary, to get them there. Even though their ideas of a utopia are different, their desire to rid the world of U.S. “imperialism” and capitalism necessitates their alliance. As Osama bin Laden himself declared in a fatwa that he issued in March 2003: “The interests of Muslims and the interests of the socialists coincide in the war against the crusaders.”
One huge problem is that they both believe it is moral to use deception, so they are probably not even honest with each other. In the end, one of them will dominate. Blindly believing that the Islamists are their friends, liberals have already conceded far too much. America’s inability to produce sufficient amounts of oil resulting from the Global Warming Treaty guarantees that trillions of dollars will go to Saudi and Arab states. The inconvenient consequence is that America is already a hostage to the Islamic goals via energy dependence. As a result of their wealth, a Saudi-funded Fifth Column has developed in America during the past thirty years. Their petrodollars have been used in this alliance to exert power and influence in America that could ultimately lead to social, financial, political, educational, and religious control. These are the very conditions of dhimmitude that are a prerequisite, part and parcel, of an Islamic One World government.
Dhimmitude is best understood in the context of Jihad, but it works for the leftist agenda as well. Dhimmitude is “tolerance” characterized by siding with one’s oppressors. Historically, dhimmitude was the condition of defeated Christian, Jewish, African, and Hindu communities under Islam. Their dhimmitude resulted from powerlessness and humiliation through conquest. In order to please his oppressors, the dhimmi learns to loathe himself and looses respect for his society to justify hateful behavior toward him. The Dhimmi loses the possibility of revolt because he loses his sense of justice and injustice.
In the Leftist-Islamic alliance, dhimmitude is perpetrated through “globalization” efforts and the corrupting power of oil money to influence think tanks, lobbyists and academic institutions. It involves a potpourri inclusive of imposed guilt feelings, multiculturalism, divisiveness by “diversity,” believing terror is justified because terrorists are poor or exploited, the rising number of Muslims in the West, to ultimately alienate Americans from our culture. Attitudes of dhimmitude have entered Western academia, school textbooks, politics, and the media. If one criticizes Islam, the multiculturalist philosophy is violated, thus endangering chances for “peace.” Giving in to ideology over fact and reality, and fear of being stigmatized as biased prevents one from the ridiculing taunts of “racist,” or “Islamophobic.” Dhimmis pay special taxes called “jizya” for the right to live. Not necessarily identified with the term “jizya,” a “jizya tax” is distorted to imply it is policy for citizen’s “protection.”
New World Order goals are outlined in “The Naked Communist,” a book written in 1958, by Cleon Skousen, a former FBI agent. Skousen claimed that top Western bankers, industrialists and related institutions were behind the rise of Communism and Fascism around the world. With a striking resemblance to dhimmitude, many of these goals have already been achieved:
- Permitting free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.
- Providing American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.
- Promoting the UN as the only hope for mankind.
- Capturing one or both of the political parties in the United States.
- Gaining control of the schools.
- Infiltrating the press.
- Gaining control of key positions in radio, television and motion pictures.
- Breaking down cultural standards of morality.
- Infiltrating the churches and replace revealed religion with social religion.
- Discrediting the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.
Richard Gardner, a Columbia University Professor and Council on Foreign Relations member described the methods of a New World Order:
“…an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece.”
Gardner named the following organizations that would help fulfill that objective: the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), the Law of the Sea Treaty, the World Food Conference, the World Population Conference, and the United Nations.
Other treaties and organizations that will help fulfill this objective are the North American Fair Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the World Trade Organization (WTO), the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP), and the Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA), and the Global Warming Treaty. The recent Bailout, the Stimulus Plan, the Omnibus Plan, Cap and Trade, and the “universal” Health Care Plan, will effectively impose a jizya tax on Americans and control many aspects of life.
Judge Advocate General of the Navy from 1956-1960 and a former member of the Council on Foreign Relations, Rear Admiral Chester Ward, warned the American people about the dangers of globalism involving the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission, by saying:
“The most powerful clique in these elitist groups has one objective—they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and the national independence of the United States. A second clique of international members in the Council on Foreign Relations comprises the Wall Street international bankers and their key agents. Primarily, they want the world banking monopoly from whatever power to end up in the control of global government.”
Ward also warned:
“The main purpose of the Council on Foreign Relations is promoting the disarmament of U.S. sovereignty and national independence and submergence into an all powerful, one world government”.
The Council on Foreign Relation sister organization is the Trilateral Commission. The Trilateral Commission was co-founded by David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski. Brzezinski calls for:
“Movement toward a larger community of the developed nations . . . through a variety of indirect ties and already developing limitations on national sovereignty.”
A Council on Foreign Relations member and U.N. spokesman, Walt Rostow praised the UN by saying:
“It is, therefore, an American interest to see an end to nationhood.”
The United Nations will stand to govern a one-world government. President George H. W. Bush may have thought the UN was a peace-keeping organization that had the unbiased interests of all the world. Thus, the former president declared his support for the UN in this 1991 statement:
“My vision of a New World Order foresees a United Nations with a revitalized peacekeeping function.”
And a second quote from the George H. W. Bush in 1992:
“It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance.”
As the descriptions suggest, Clinton’s Global Warming Treaty and the NATO Expansion Treaty were designed to bind the United States in a global web of entanglement for the purpose of “binding international commitments to protect the environment.” He referred to his treaties as “international ground rules for the 21st century, ” urging all Americans to support “the emerging international system.”
Warren Christopher, the Secretary of State under Bill Clinton, told CNN in 1993:
“We must get the New World Order on track and bring the UN into its correct role in regards to the United States.”
Undoubtedly Senior Bush and Bill Clinton did not know that the UN would fall under Islamic control. That is because the largest voting bloc in the UN is the Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC), and the OIC is a group of 57 (56 by other counts) Islamic dominated nations. In 1990, they adopted the “Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam,” dictating that Islam is the only legitimate religion. The Cairo Declaration is bloated with hypocritical vanity and double standards. Pierced with loopholes, it is a manifesto declaring that Islamic law (Shari’ah) is the only true source of human rights. Article Two of the declaration employs Orwellian phrasing to declare its plan for governance:
“(a) Life is a God-given gift and the right to life is guaranteed to every human being. It is the duty of individuals, societies and states to protect this right from any violation, and it is prohibited to take away life except for a Shari’ah prescribed reason.
(b) It is forbidden to resort to such means as may result in the genocidal annihilation of mankind.
(c) The preservation of human life throughout the term of time willed by God is a duty prescribed by Shari’ah
(d) Safety from bodily harm is a guaranteed right. It is the duty of the state to safeguard it, and it is prohibited to breach it without a Shari’ah prescribed reason.”
The OIC and its allied organizations have aggressively engaged in efforts to expand Shari’ah law in the West. If that were to happen, it will be the end of the freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and freedom of conscience that we cherish. Under the guise of multiculturalism, new rules will be enforced, and those rules will almost inevitably be Islamic—much to the dismay of leftist-socialists and non-secular communists.
The global governance agenda will utilize those immigrants in America who care or know nothing about democracy like invasive species. In an attempt to divide, weaken and conquer a traditional “ecosystem” with ideological warfare to force Americans to submit to global laws and courts.
It has been reported that George Bush II brought more Muslims into America than the combined total of all U.S. presidents, and Obama is expected to continue the invasive influx and outright importation of Muslims, whose totalitarian ideology enforced with Shari’ah Law is openly hostile to all free thinking individuals.
For decades, America has succumbed to the New World Order ideology and it is happening through commerce, education, immigration, the media, and political alliances. We are naïve to think a New World Order will not easily fall under Islamic domination. As a result, Americans of all political affiliations and nationalities are potentially unwary victims of a threatening ideological invasion that must be understood in order to be stopped.
 Schlafley, Phyllis; “Liberty Verses Totalitarianism, Clinton Style,” The Phyllis Schlafley Report, Volume 31, No. 12, July, 1998, http://www.eagleforum.org/psr/1998/july98/psrjuly98.html
 Baldwin, Chuck; “More on the New World Order,” January 30, 2009, http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin488.htm
 Lewis, James; “Barrack Obama and Alinsky’s Rules for Psychopaths,” September 25, 2008, http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/09/barack_obama_and_alinskys_rule.html
 “The Enemy of My Enemy,” IPT News, August 7, 2009, http://www.investigativeproject.org/1369/the-enemy-of-my-enemy
 “Islam and the Socialist Left,” http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/guideDesc.asp?catid=123&type=issue
 Jansen, Richard C.; “A Short History of Kosovo,” April 25, 1999, http://lamar.colostate.edu/~grjan/kosovohistory.html
 Thorn, Victor; “Change? Obama Inner Circle Filled With Bilderbergers”, http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/obama_bilderbergers_160.html